NewsBite

PM urged to abandon plan to build subs

A large group of centre-right elder statesmen, senior former defence department figures and leading think-tank experts have made the call.

Former deputy prime minister John Anderson. Picture: AAP
Former deputy prime minister John Anderson. Picture: AAP

The Morrison government should abandon plans to build eight nuclear-powered attack submarines in Adelaide and instead accelerate efforts to acquire an Australian nuclear submarine capability by leasing a boat from the US or Britain, followed by an overseas build, according to a large group of centre-right elder statesmen, senior former defence department figures and leading think-tank experts interviewed by The Weekend Australian.

Former deputy prime minister, John Anderson is the most clear cut. He told The Weekend Australian: “We are no longer a manufacturing country. That is tragic but a reality we have ­allowed to evolve. We are being less than forthright if we think we can build something as complex as nuclear submarines here in an effective and timely way.”

Mr Anderson warmly praised Scott Morrison for choosing ­nuclear-powered submarines, but said: “We can’t hope to match the brilliance of those who have had decades of designing and building nuclear subs. Just buy the best, our people deserve nothing less.”

Dennis Richardson, a former secretary of the defence department, described the decision to switch to nuclear-powered subs, which he supports, as seminal, but is sceptical of the ability to build them, or all of them, in Australia.

“It’s essential the government does not allow domestic political considerations to compro­mise what will be a national en­terprise. In terms of both cost and schedule, it would make sense for the first one or two boats to be substantially built overseas,” he said.

Former prime minister John Howard, a strong supporter of the AUKUS initiative and of nuclear submarines, told The Weekend Australian: “Operationally, strategically and politically it was a very good decision. The public quite likes the concept of AUKUS. I have no problem with nuclear power for power generation as well as submarines.”

However, Mr Howard said he believed the government should look at leasing submarines from the US or Britain so they arrive as an Australian capability before the near 20 years envisaged in the government’s current thinking.

Another former prime minister, Tony Abbott, while also praising Mr Morrison for switching to nuclear, also strongly supports the leasing option. He told The Weekend Australian: “Speed is of the essence here, even more important than a local build.”

Coalition senator and former major general Jim Molan believes the subs are too far off to have any effect on the strategic challenge posed by China: “What good is it having an eye-pleasing defence industry in 20 years time if we lose the next war? Operational need must trump the industry need.”

Senator Molan further said: “The PM’s prediction on getting the nuclear submarines in one or two decades means we will fight the (hypothetical) China war with the Collins-class submarines.

“The nukes are a worthwhile long-term strategic objective, but they are not the one answer to our national security needs. The next 18 months will be key. Can the PM find more subs sooner?” he said.

Senator Molan also believes at least the first couple of subs should be built overseas.

These reactions, which are widely shared by political, industry, think-tank and other defence figures, highlight the extreme uncertainty of the government’s in-principle decision to go with nuclear-powered subs.

There is a widespread view among defence professionals that it is completely unrealistic to think the ageing Collins subs can continue to be the nation’s front line military capability into the 2040s and potentially the 2050s.

Peter Jennings, the director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, suggests abandoning the idea of an Adelaide build altogether, and instead seeking to get work for Australian suppliers integrated into an enlarged US submarine supply line.

He also believes Australia will need another conventional sub to act as a bridge between the Collins boats and the nuclear subs.

As the euphoria which first greeted the AUKUS announcements washes away, profound and troubling questions remain about Australia’s slender military capabilities going forward.

Greg Sheridan
Greg SheridanForeign Editor

Greg Sheridan is The Australian's foreign editor. His most recent book, Christians, the urgent case for Jesus in our world, became a best seller weeks after publication. It makes the case for the historical reliability of the New Testament and explores the lives of early Christians and contemporary Christians. He is one of the nation's most influential national security commentators, who is active across television and radio, and also writes extensively on culture and religion. He has written eight books, mostly on Asia and international relations. A previous book, God is Good for You, was also a best seller. When We Were Young and Foolish was an entertaining memoir of culture, politics and journalism. As foreign editor, he specialises in Asia and America. He has interviewed Presidents and Prime Ministers around the world.

Add your comment to this story

To join the conversation, please Don't have an account? Register

Join the conversation, you are commenting as Logout

Original URL: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/pm-urged-to-abandon-plan-to-build-subs/news-story/b6d8e09ac33ffcb217a3065ee4781f5f