NewsBite

LIVE

Judge allows Network Ten to reopen Bruce Lehrmann defamation case

Federal Court judge Michael Lee has allowed Network Ten to reopen its defamation case with Bruce Lehrmann, to analyse fresh evidence brought by former Seven producer Taylor Auerbach.

Illustration: Emilia Tortorella
Illustration: Emilia Tortorella

  Network 10 is making a last minute bid to have its mammoth defamation trial with former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann reopened. Follow the latest below.

Live Updates

Auerbach ordered to give masseuse evidence

DAILY TELEGRAPH MARCH 25, 2024. Taylor Auerbach making a statement to the media at Arthur McElhone Reserve in Elizabeth Bay. Picture: Jonathan Ng

Former Seven producer Taylor Auerbach will be required to produce to the Federal Court any documents showing a "misuse of funds" while employed by the network, the court has heard.

Bruce Lehrmann's barrister Matthew Richardson SC indicated on Tuesday evening that he would serve a subpoena to Mr Auerbach requiring him to produce the documents.

This comes following allegations aired in the media of Mr Auerbach using his company-issued card to pay for $2,940 worth of Thai massages for himself and Mr Lehrmann, while wooing him for the Spotlight interview.

Mr Lehrmann denies having participated in the massages.

Justice Michael Lee ordered Mr Auerbach to respond to the subpoena by 9:30am Thursday.

Mr Auerbach will appear in court at 2:15pm on Thursday to give evidence-in-chief and be cross-examined.

Justice Lee indicated he would likely be able to deliver judgment early next week.

Justice Lee allows Ten to reopen defamation case

Taylor Auerbach (L) and Bruce Lehrmann (R)

Federal Court judge Michael Lee has allowed Network Ten to reopen its defamation case with Bruce Lehrmann, to analyse fresh evidence brought by former Seven producer Taylor Auerbach.

As such, Justice Lee told the court on Tuesday afternoon it is "unlikely" he will deliver judgment in the matter on Thursday as planned.

Justice Lee said the evidence given by Mr Auerbach not only goes to the credit of Mr Lehrmann, but is "broader than that".

"This is clearly fresh evidence," he said. "It may or may not be material at the end of the day that the determination proceedings, but it is not simply a matter which goes to the credibility of the applicant, but the way in which the respondents put it, is broader than that."

Justice Lee said there was an "intense public interest of people not thinking that relevant material has been able to be achieved for the parties if they say that it is relevant to the determination of the issues."

"At the end of the day, my obligation is to deliver judgement justly and efficiently and with the least delay," he said. "I think the delay, if I manage this, along the lines that I've discussed with counsel will be relatively minimal in the scheme of things."

Justice Lee said he would be unable to deliver judgment until "at least next week".

"The short point is that I would give leave to reopen," he said.

Justice Lee has adjourned for 15 minutes to allow Mr Lehrmann's legal team to determine what subpoenas must be issued to the Seven Network to proceed.

Mr Lehrmann's barrister Matthew Richardson SC rejected much of the alleged new evidence as “trivial” and questioned whether Mr Auerbach was suffering from a psychiatric condition, suggesting Mr Auerbach himself had claimed a “psychiatric injury” caused by his separation from Seven.

"Speaking frankly, multiple journalists, including I assume some of the back of the court, have described his appearances in public in recent weeks as bizarre," Mr Richardson said. "That is a word that has been used frequently."

Lehrmann barrister: new evidence insignificant

Bruce Lehrmann's barrister Matthew Richardson SC says new evidence brought forth by former Network Seven producer Taylor Auerbach is insignificant and inadmissible.

Mr Richardson told Justice Michael Lee that fresh evidence "should be admitted only when it is so material that the interest of justice requires it."

Mr Richardson said evidence showing Mr Lehrmann provided Seven with intimate private messages between Brittany Higgins and her former boyfriend was irrelevant because the messages had already appeared in the media.

He also said there was little evidence showing that Mr Lehrmann WhatsApped or AirDropped confidential documents to Seven journalists.

Mr Richardson said that, if Mr Auerbach is called as a new witness, Mr Lehrmann's legal team needs "a basic opportunity to test what he's going to say."

"Obviously we will be submitting that the substance of the evidence wasn't put to (Mr Lehrmann), and that raising this collateral topic through a new witness credit material is not going to be admissible," Mr Richardson said.

Mr Richardson continued: "This is a brand new witness. We need to subpoena Channel Seven. We need to find out what happened when he left there. We need to know what was passing between him and (Seven producer Mark) Llewellyn and (Former Seven producer Steve) Jackson."

Mr Richardson said if Mr Auerbach were put in the witness box tomorrow, his team would not have an appropriate amount of time to properly interrogate Mr Auerbach and his evidence.

Benefits to Lehrmann may have been greater: Ten

NEWS.COM.AU ASSIGNMENT - EXC PICS -  Bruce Lehrmann brings plates of food to a friends house on Easter Saturday*** Where image credits are published, "KHAPGG" must be included. KHAPGG reserves the right to reverse any prior publishing or usage permissions where "KHAPGG" credits have been excluded from published image credits.***  Picture: KHAPGG/news.com.au

Bruce Lehrmann may have received greater benefits than initially disclosed in exchange for his exclusive interview with Seven's flagship current affairs program Spotlight, the court has heard.

During the defamation trial, it was revealed Mr Lehrmann received a year of free rent from the Seven Network in exchange for signing his name to a media exclusivity agreement.

However, Lisa Wilkinson's barrister Sue Chrysanthou SC told the court on Tuesday that "it would appear there was months more of rental, paid for by Network Seven in (former Seven producer) Taylor Auerbach's name."

"It's quite a complicated set of financial affairs," Ms Chrysanthou said.

"But it appears to, if accepted, demonstrate that neither Network Seven – who were required to respond to subpoenas – nor Mr Lehrmann had been entirely honest about the financial benefits that Mr Lehmann received."

Ms Chrysanthou said that the evidence relating to benefits received by Mr Lehrmann in exchange for the interview goes not only to his credit, but to damages.

She said Justice Lee would be required to take into consideration any goods or services given to Mr Lehrmann when considering whether he is awarded damages.

Auerbach to be cross examined if case reopened

Network Ten's barrister Matthew Collins KC says that if Justice Michael Lee were to reopen the case, former Seven producer Taylor Auerbach would be required to enter the witness box.

Dr Collins is seeking to tender affidavits from Mr Auerbach, which contain details about how Seven Spotlight came into possession of material it used in its interview with Bruce Lehrmann.

"If you were to grant us leave to reopen the case, we would propose to call Mr Auerbach to adduce that evidence," Dr Collins told the court.

"He would need to be exposed to cross examination."

Mr Auerbach would only be exposed to cross examination if Mr Lehrmann's barrister were to object to the evidence.

Justice Lee indicated that if he were to allow Ten's fresh evidence from Mr Auerbach, the former Spotlight producer would be put under cross-examination tomorrow.

Lehrmann 'leak an outrageous contempt of court': Ten

Network Ten's barrister Matthew Collins KC has accused Bruce Lehrmann of an "outrageous contempt of court" when leaking confidential information to Seven.

Mr Lehrmann repeatedly lied when interviewed on Seven's Spotlight program, Dr Collins told the Federal Court, and intentionally tried to undermine the credit of witnesses in the defamation case.

Dr Collins is seeking to tender evidence about how Spotlight came into possession of material it used in its interview with Mr Lehrmann, including ­recordings of a five-hour pre-­interview meeting between Lisa Wilkinson, her producer Angus Llewellyn, Brittany Higgins and her partner, David Sharaz.

Dr Collins on Tuesday afternoon said Mr Lehrmann "told a series of falsehoods" when interviewed on Spotlight last year, and "impugned one of the witnesses in the case, Lauren Gain, accusing her of concocting evidence … in order to do him in."

He told Justice Michael Lee that Mr Lehrmann provided Seven with "2300 odd pages of the most intimate private messages between (Brittany Higgins) and a former boyfriend."

"No doubt in the hope that they would be broadcast and disseminated to her embarrassment," Dr Collins said.

"All of this done in the immediate lead up to a defamation trial before Your Honour … and can only have been calculated to put pressure on witnesses and parties."

Dr Collins said the five-hour recording of the first meeting between Wilkinson, The Project producer Angus Llewellyn and Ms Higgins was "highly unflattering" for those involved.

"It is in our submission, the definition of an abuse of process," he said.

"What Mr Lehrmann ought to have been doing was concentrating his efforts on persuading Your Honour that he could establish the elements of the cause of action for defamation and that our defences did not have legs."

Dr Collins told the court Mr Lehrmann misled his lawyers and the court when saying he did not leak the information to Seven.

Dr Collins said this was "an outrageous contempt of court".

Ten's barrister accuses Lehrmann of misleading legal team

SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA: NewsWire Photos: APRIL 02 2024: Tens lawyers Dr Matthew Collins and Marlia Saunders for the Lehrmann hearing are seen arriving at the Federal Court in Sydney. Picture: NCA NewsWire/ Gaye Gerard

Network Ten's barrister Matthew Collins KC has accused Bruce Lehrmann of misleading his lawyers when telling them he did not provide confidential documents to the Seven Network as part of an exclusive interview last year.

Dr Collins is seeking to tender an affidavit which contains details about how Spotlight came into possession of material it used in its interview with Mr Lehrmann, including ­recordings of a five-hour pre-­interview meeting between Lisa Wilkinson, her producer Angus Llewellyn, Brittany Higgins and her partner, David Sharaz.

Mr Lehrmann has long denied he was the source of the recordings, and of vision of Ms Higgins and Mr Lehrmann inside Parliament House that was obtained under subpoena during the criminal trial but used on the program.

Dr Collins told Justice Michael Lee on Tuesday afternoon that Mr Lehrmann was provided an "e-brief" during his ACT Supreme Court criminal trial, which contained those recordings.

"It was … served on Mr Lehrmann in his capacity as the accused," Dr Collins said.

"All of the material in that e-brief was confidential and … subject to an implied undertaking that it not be used for any purpose other than the proceedings in which Mr Lehrmann was the accused."

Dr Collins made reference to a subpoena Network Ten's legal team made to Seven in June, seeking the network to disclose "all communications or documents evidencing communications between Mr Lehrmann, or anyone on his behalf, and the Seven Network".

"Nothing was produced in response to that category," Dr Collins said, saying a lawyer for Seven said "as far as our client is aware, the material referred to in your letter did not come into his position in breach of the implied undertaking."

The "implied undertaking" to which the Seven lawyer referred is the Harman undertaking, which means when a party receives documents or information from another party to the proceedings, that party can only use that information for the purposes of the proceedings.

Dr Collins then told the court that, back in June, Ten's lawyers submitted that "the obvious inference was that it was Mr Lehrmann who had provided the materials in breach of his Harman obligations."

"That prompted a response (from Mr Lehrmann's lawyers) to the effect that we had made an improper and unjustifiable allegation," Dr Collins said.

Dr Collins made clear that he did not blame Mr Lehrmann's legal team for making that response.

"If you want to accept the evidence on which we seek to adduce, they have been led into error and made submissions which are incorrect, without any fault on their part," Dr Collins said.

Indications Lehrmann's barrister will object to new evidence

Bruce Lehrmann's barrister Matthew Richardson SC has indicated he will object to evidence brought by former Seven producer Taylor Auerbach.

That affidavit is believed to be about 2000 pages, and contains details about how Spotlight came into possession of material it used in its interview with Mr Lehrmann, including ­recordings of a five-hour pre-­interview meeting between Lisa Wilkinson, her producer Angus Llewellyn, Brittany Higgins and her partner, David Sharaz.

Mr Lehrmann has long denied he was the source of the recordings, and of vision of Ms Higgins and Mr Lehrmann inside Parliament House that was obtained under subpoena during the criminal trial but used on the program.

Mr Richardson had previously told the court on Tuesday he would make objections "at some subsequent point" about the affidavit.

Network Ten's barrister Matthew Collins KC told the court the application was "unusual and exceptional" but thanked Justice Michael Lee for hearing him on it.

Lehrmann's lawyers arrive ahead of urgent hearing

Bruce Lehrmann's lawyers have appeared at the Federal Court ahead of an urgent hearing brought on by Network Ten.

The hearing, due to start at 5pm, was called on Easter Sunday, after Ten made an application to reopen the defamation trial based on fresh evidence provided by former Seven producer Taylor Auerbach.

Mr Lehrmann's barrister Matthew Richardson SC and solicitor Mark O'Brien arrived at the court around 4.45pm.

Mr Lehrmann did not appear with them, despite being present in the courtroom every day through the lengthy five week trial last year.

Lawyers for Network Ten, including silk Matthew Collins KC and solicitor Marlia Saunders, also arrived just before 5pm.

Lisa Wilkinson is not in court, however her barrister, Sue Chrysanthou SC, is.

Auerbach is also not present in the courtroom. The Australian understands he signed an affidavit containing the fresh evidence over the weekend while in New Zealand.

New claims in Lehrmann case hours before hearing

In another shock development in the Ten Network’s bid to re-open the Bruce Lehrmann defamation case, the network on Tuesday afternoon filed a new affidavit from disgruntled former Seven Network producer Taylor Auerbach about conversations he allegedly had with Seven executives.

The affidavit comes just hours before Justice Michael Lee is to hear Ten’s application to re-open the case on the basis of allegations by Auerbach about how the Seven Network’s Spotlight program came into possession of material it used in its interview with Lehrmann.

The new affidavit is believed to consist of further recollections by Auerbach of conversations he had with Lehrmann and Spotlight executive producer Mark Llewellyn.

Read more here

Original URL: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/network-ten-seeks-to-reopen-bruce-lehrmann-case-following-taylor-auerbach-evidence/live-coverage/141b07dcdac920d09603c43dde584ffb