Raising the spirits of Paris after Notre-Dame fire
The Notre-Dame cathedral is being slowly returned to its former glory after the 2019 fire.
Graphic novelist, Sandrine Martin, was at home in southern Paris on April 15, 2019, when she noticed an enormous plume of black and yellow smoke billowing in the distance. It was around 6.30pm on a clear, crisp spring evening and she didn’t think too much of it until the wail of sirens multiplied and instinct made her turn to the news.
As her phone flickered to life, footage of the cathedral of Notre-Dame engulfed in flames appeared, its spire toppling in slow motion into the void.
The sight unleashed a collective howl of helpless sorrow in the French capital which would quickly reverberate around the world: “We all remember that moment … everyone in Paris cannot ever forget. It was very, very shocking,” Martin reminisced.
She did not know it then, but 14 months later, Martin would be one of five artists invited by Parisian authorities to sketch and document the enormous, two-year, €165m ($240m) project to stabilise the devastated cathedral so reconstruction of the roof and spire can now begin in earnest. Experts estimate that the final bill to reopen Notre-Dame’s doors – scheduled for completion in 2024 – could top €400m ($585m).
An army of carpenters, abseilers, scaffolders, master glassmakers, art restorers, mural painters and crane operators were recruited from all over France and have spent the past 2½ years preparing the site for the rebuilding stage.
Led by five-star French Army General, Jean-Louis Georgelin, salvage teams faced a difficult, first complication because when the fire broke out, the spire and flying buttresses, eroded by time and pollution, were already under restoration and the building covered in high rise scaffolding.
By the time the flames were extinguished the following day, not only had the roof and spire collapsed but the cathedral was entangled in a web of 30,000 melted metal tubes and scorched wood weighing 300 tonnes, some dangling precariously 90m in the air and adding a further, imminent threat to the structure. (Thankfully, the statues of the Twelve Apostles that flanked the spire had been removed from the roof just four days before the fire.)
Before any work could commence, monitors had to be carefully positioned onto the burned scaffolding to measure the tiniest shifts in the metal and to ensure those working below had enough warning to evacuate in the event of total collapse. A secondary, three-level skeleton of metal beams was then installed so teams of specialist abseilers could attach themselves and descend into the heart of the scaffolding.
At first, the rope teams were forced to work by hand, swinging carefully as close as they could to remove the molten tubes, placing them into baskets suspended between them. This alone took three months. Next, an army of scaffolders moved in, installing a tower crane to extract the rest of the burnt structure, including an enormous wooden beam in the transept which was also on the brink of collapse.
As winter approached, an enormous, temporary “umbrella” was placed over the great hole where the roof once was and 60 custom-built wooden hangars, each weighing more than one tonne and spanning 6m, were installed into the most weakened bays while rope access teams finished cleaning the four vaults and removed remaining loose debris. Work was stop-start for a while due to Covid but by mid-last year, the grand organ was also dismantled and artefacts, including sculptures and paintings which had survived the fire, were removed for cleaning and restoration.
Miraculously, while the modern altar was crushed by falling debris, the 14th century stone sculpture nearby, Virgin of Paris, escaped unscathed while just a few pieces of glass in three panels in the monumental stained glass were broken, knocked out by the tip of the falling spire.
Michel Picaud, president of Friends of Notre-Dame, says that while fundraising for restoration works had begun two years before the fire, the flood of love and financial support in the wake of the catastrophe was unprecedented.
“I was born in Paris and Notre-Dame has always been for me the centre of the city, both from a political standpoint and from a religious one … on the other hand, the outpouring of support made me realise that Notre-Dame de Paris not only belongs to the French but to the whole world,” he told Inquirer.
“It’s a symbol of Christianity in its universal sense, going beyond the barriers of citizenship, race, or faith. Notre-Dame de Paris belongs to everybody on this planet.”
As safeguarding work continued at pace, the 1000 oak trees needed to rebuild the spire, transept and adjacent bays were selected by master craftsmen and harvested before their sap could rise, between January and March last year. Half the trees came from public forests, the other half donated by owners of private land: sawing operations required 45 mills and only finished in January this year.
Georgelin observed that eight of the 1000 oaks had girths larger than 1m, able to produce more than 20m of wood each. They were chosen specifically to create spans of a particular curvature for the new cathedral spire: “These eight oaks will form the beams on which the new spire will rest. They will be delivered in the spring to the carpenters who, after a trial assembly in the workshop, will put them together on site in 2023, ready for reopening the following year.”
Walking Notre-Dame’s perimeter, I was struck by the fact that the biggest of these new oaks had been planted just before the French Revolution by royal foresters responsible for ensuring that the navy was kept constantly supplied with fresh ship masts.
Martin says one of the other, less known, and yet equally grave complications faced by specialist teams is toxic pollution: hundreds of tonnes of ancient lead in the cathedral’s roof had melted in the heat of the blaze, releasing particles into the air and settling into surrounding areas. All 8000 pipes of the grand organ, which has been the cathedral’s “voice” since 1733, have had to be decontaminated before they can undergo restoration.
“When we visited, it was fascinating for me because I did not know that before anyone enters, they must take all their clothes off. Everything, underwear, everything, then you must shower and put on special clothes, hats and masks. When you leave, you do the same … it is to protect against lead poisoning or lead coming out of the site,” she said. (Even the President of the Republic had to abide by this undressing protocol).
A further conundrum for French authorities lay with deciding exactly how the Gothic building should be rebuilt. The cathedral, of course, dates to the 12th and 13th centuries, a revolutionary new masterpiece with soaring, thin walls, huge, pointed arches and windows allowing the interiors to flood with light. It began as a replacement for the older and smaller Roman cathedral, and then expanded into the much larger sanctuary which would go on to host myriad historic events including the coronation of Emperor Napoleon in 1804.
However, the ravages of time, previous fires and the 1789 Revolution meant that by the early 19th century, Notre-Dame was in a parlous state and, as extraordinary as it sounds to us today, serious thought was given to its demolition. An eleventh-hour campaign – helped enormously by Victor Hugo’s hugely popular 1831 novel, The Hunchback of Notre-Dame – sparked the French public’s imagination and in 1842, authorities changed tack and appointed Eugene Viollet-le-Duc, a brilliant, young architect (and thinker) to lead what would become a 20-year rebuilding project.
The product of two generations of illustrious architects, Viollet-le-Duc was unusual in that he had travelled extensively throughout Europe, studying medieval architecture in situ. However, he chose to continue his education with building teams rather than in university lectures, restoring a variety of French Gothic buildings, including the abbey of La Madeleine at Vezelay, the first overseen by a modern, state commission.
The rebuilding of Notre-Dame was challenging even then because Viollet-le-Duc was also forced to choose between different time periods for his reconstruction.
The facade, for example, had been built in the 12th century but had undergone a dramatic reconfiguration in the 13th century, including the addition of much larger windows and the instantly recognisable flying buttresses, while the interiors had been remodelled in the 1700s.
Which Notre-Dame to choose?
In the end, he would favour the rayonnant or height of Gothic style of the 13th century over the original, Roman style, while also cherrypicking a few aspects he particularly liked such as the 12th century rose windows.
One of Viollet-le-Duc’s most extraordinary achievements was his decision to commission replicas of scores of missing medieval sculptures after researching and sketching hundreds that he had seen in engravings or in other Gothic cathedrals. His sculptors were given detailed instructions and he followed their work closely: the copper statue of Saint Thomas, the apostle on the cathedral roof, bears his features.
President Emmanuel Macron and French historic monument authorities also took their time to decide exactly how to restore Notre-Dame. Originally, Macron tried to encourage architects to consider a “contemporary gesture”.
Some argued that rebuilding the roof in wood made no sense and modern materials should be considered, but the spate of wild design ideas that emerged – among them a greenhouse or an open-air swimming pool – polarised the French and last year, it was announced that medieval materials and building techniques would be used to rebuild the spire.
A team of three architects, led by Philippe Villeneuve who has led maintenance works at Notre-Dame since 2013 (and sports a tattoo of the spire on his left arm), is now hard at work supervising works that will see the cathedral return to “its last known state”, in other words, Viollet-le-Duc’s restored vision.
Last month, archaeological work commissioned before scaffolding is installed for the spire rebuild unearthed an ancient lead sarcophagus, and a small camera sent inside revealed cloth remains, hair and a plant “crown” suggesting it belonged to a dignitary and is likely to date back to the 14th century.
Martin, whose drawings adorn the hoardings that surround the work site and will be familiar to Parisians and tourists alike, says that one of the most exciting aspects of seeing the restoration up close is discovering the remnants of colour and design reintroduced by the 19th century architect.
“In the Middle Ages, you think it must have all been white and sculptural but no, it was all painted in bright colours, everything, even the facade was painted. Before, everything was all black and dirty from the smoke of candles for so many years. Now, it will be a shock for people to see it all clean and renewed,” she told Inquirer.
“It’s a fantastic opportunity to rediscover this patrimony, this richness of paintings and walls and sculptures, the brilliance of the decorations painted by Viollet-le Duc. I used all his palette of colours, the yellows, the reds and blues, in my drawings … it is really nice to be able to show and explain it to people while they wait for Notre-Dame to return.”
