University leader calls for ‘end to micromanagement’ from government
In the run-up to the last election, Labor made big transformative promises about the higher education sector.
Foreshadowing what became the Universities Accord, then education spokeswoman Tanya Plibersek positioned Labor as establishing a once-in-a-generation transformation of higher education, rising above the party political fray; they would “stop the bickering”, “dial down the politics” and “end uncertainty” for students and the sector.
After the election, new Education Minister Jason Clare echoed those sentiments when he announced the accord. He was focused on “resetting the relationship” between government and the sector; “rebuilding” international education and making “real long-lasting change” to improve equity and stability for universities and their students.
There have certainly been some positives: 20,000 government-funded places were created for equity students, although those places expire for next year’s commencements. The introduction of “prac payments” for some students undertaking practicals as part of their studies is a welcome relief for those students, although the eligibility net could have been cast wider. The reform of the Australian Research Council to remove political interference in decision-making is likewise welcome.
Yet the reality of the past three years has been very different from the promises of the accord.
Instead of greater stability, support and transparency, universities face more uncertainty, increased bureaucracy and micromanagement, and greater politicisation of the sector.
Imagine a situation in which a government – any government – introduced export caps on individual companies in the resources sector, with no consultation with the sector on those caps, and hadn’t modelled the impact of the caps on GDP or on jobs. This is the situation higher education faces, our largest non-resource-based export industry.
Universities are often criticised for their reliance on international student revenue, but the reality is this revenue is used to a large degree to make up for underfunding of research. Australian government funding of research and development is around a third lower than the OECD average, and less than a third of that goes to universities.
There is a conversation to be had about the level of internationalisation we want in universities and the impacts that might have on housing and the economy, but arbitrary restrictions – first through ministerial diktat then through proposed, if ultimately unsuccessful, legislation – is not the kind of conversation the accord promised.
Universities also face increased government reporting and oversight on issues from student support to preventing gender-based violence, despite an regulatory framework that already addressed these issues. In the absence of better funding, this can only divert resources from student-facing activities to increased compliance obligations.
And while the headline intent of the accord was to support increased participation and outcomes, particularly for equity students, the funding mechanism to achieve this is yet to be announced. Proposals released for consultation earlier this year, however, did not inspire, with further increased bureaucracy and reporting. Realistically, any revised funding mechanism is unlikely to be implemented before 2027 at the earliest.
The next parliamentary term looks to be one of peak uncertainty for universities. We know the bad: drastic cuts in revenue through restrictions on international students. We have no certainty about the potential good: funding mechanisms to support equity and growth ambitions. It is little surprise many universities have announced significant cuts and job losses.
As we enter the election cycle, we need to stop using higher education as a political football for debates over immigration.
We need certainty over funding so we can continue to deliver the world-class education and research of which Australia is rightly proud. We need to trust universities to deliver this without constant bureaucracy and reporting, while holding them accountable for outcomes.
Graham Brown is the Charles Sturt University provost and deputy vice-chancellor (academic)
De facto student cap would be ‘illegal’
A former Immigration Department deputy executive made the claim as the government vowed to manage numbers ‘in a fairer way’ after the Coalition blocked its controversial student caps legislation.
ACU ‘committed to Catholic identity, but challenged by it’: Priest
An new advisor of Catholic Identity and Mission at the university disagreed that the university was ‘ambivalent about its Catholic identity’ following a series of public controversies.