An unforgettable Remembrance Day
The Whitlam Dismissal, 50 years on
‘I saw journalists with their hands shaking’: Paul Kelly recalls the Dismissal
From Whitlam to Albanese: the remaking of Australian politics
The day that shocked the nation
Whitlam’s long shadow still looms over us all
Whitlam ignored all the warnings
I saw it all – Kerr’s move strengthened democracy
The action of the governor-general resolved an administrative gridlock and political stalemate.
My dad’s downfall brought out the worst and best in people
Truth and fury: Whitlam Dismissal not quite as unprecedented as it seemed
‘Don’t write some emotional piece of trash’: Paul Kelly on the Dismissal
Kerr failed by not warning Whitlam: Fraser
Kerr’s torture over Whitlam dismissal revealed from grave
Dismissal day: ‘People very nearly fell down in the street with dismay’
The Dismissal wasn’t the end of democracy
In fact, Australia escaped virtually unscathed from the political crisis of 1975.
An unforgettable Remembrance Day
The Whitlam era was one of enduring change and great mistakes.
‘Partisan ambush’: PM fights for Whitlam in scorching speech
From the moment it was revealed, the Dismissal divided families, workplaces, classrooms, communities and newspapers, including this one. In his commentaries Kelly was a powerful critic of Kerr, arguing the governor-general had abused the reserve power, the power of the crown, by not consulting properly with his prime minister. Kelly also knew, amid economic chaos of which he had been highly critical, that Whitlam, a brilliant but deeply flawed politician, was on a hiding to nothing at the election, which Labor lost in a landslide. The Australian , overall, was also highly critical of Whitlam’s government, believing it was an economic danger to the country – which it was, as was evident in the Khemlani loans scandal. But unlike Kelly, the paper backed Liberal Party leader Malcolm Fraser, a stoic, intimidating character who as opposition leader precipitated the crisis by blocking supply in the Senate. We also supported the Dismissal, arguing: “No country can prosper, develop or sustain and expand a generous social program for the people unless it can afford it.”
New insights are still emerging, 50 years later. In an astonishing archival discovery, Bramston revealed this week, Fraser came to agree with Whitlam on a central point of the drama: that Kerr should have warned Whitlam and not dismissed him by surprise ambush. The governor-general failed in his duty to discuss the options facing the nation with the prime minister of the day. Kerr doubtless feared Whitlam would have sacked him had he warned about the possibility of using his reserve powers.
Those powers still exist but, as Kelly writes, the system should never be pushed to such a breaking point again. Nor will it. All subsequent governors-general have said, in public or private, they would not have acted as Kerr did. And the nation’s recovery from those events, and subsequent history, show the resilience of Australia’s democracy.
“Write something for the ages,” The Australian’s most senior political correspondent, Paul Kelly, then 28, told himself as he started to write our front page story about 7pm on the night of November 11, 1975. He did. It began: “The nation faces elections for both Houses of federal parliament on December 13 after the 21st Prime Minister, Gough Whitlam, was dismissed yesterday by the Governor-General, Sir John Kerr.” It was “the most astonishing Remembrance Day since the Great War”, Kelly recalls in The Weekend Magazine. Our most serious political and constitutional crisis is etched indelibly in the memories of Australians over 60; younger generations continue to discover it in awe, informed 50 years on by Kelly, now the paper’s editor-at-large, and Troy Bramston, Whitlam’s definitive biographer.