NewsBite

Karl Rove

Virtual campaigning raises stakes in US debates

Karl Rove
Donald Trump, in Atlanta on Wednesday, needs to turn political rallies into presidential events. Picture: AFP
Donald Trump, in Atlanta on Wednesday, needs to turn political rallies into presidential events. Picture: AFP

COVID-19 has transformed so many things, from work and school to travel and simple human interactions. Politics hasn’t escaped alteration.

Take the US national conventions ahead of November’s presidential election. These sprawling political festivals draw delegates, party leaders, donors, activists and journalists, as well as the simply curious and advocates of important and sometimes bizarre causes. All are treated to a week of speeches, rallies, entertainment and business: approving a platform and nominating a presidential ticket.

No more. Because of the coronavirus, Democrats cancelled their Milwaukee festivities, downsizing the in-person part to essential business and virtualising everything else. Republicans moved from Charlotte, North Carolina, to Jacksonville, Florida, because North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper wouldn’t allow the party to fill up a big arena for ­Donald Trump’s acceptance speech. Both conventions will be slimmed down, with important fundraising, networking and mobilisation activities nixed or reduced to Zoom sessions or small, socially distanced interactions.

Convention planners are grappling with how to build enough interest and tension to draw a large television audience for the acceptance speeches, the crucial opportunity to lay down big themes and outline a vision. Ideally, more people will be watching than at any other time in the campaign except the debates. Almost 34 million people watched Hillary Clinton’s July 2016 acceptance speech, after nearly 35 million watched Trump’s earlier that month. This speech is especially important for the incumbent to show he has a worthy second act. It will tax each party’s creativity to draw the maximum number of eyeballs next month.

Unless COVID-19 retreats, the fall campaign will also be transformed.

Gone will be big rallies, endless bus tours and days spent going from hangar to hangar as candidates hopscotch across battleground states.

There will be more set-piece speeches like the one Biden delivered on Tuesday (Wednesday AEST) to a nearly empty room, outlining his $US2 trillion ($2.9 trillion) version of the Green New Deal.

There will also be more releases of position papers, like Biden’s 110-page report last week of the issue groups he and Bernie Sanders ­organised.

Each campaign, if it’s wise, will plan its social media more carefully to set messages for the day, and deploy more surrogates to hit local television and newspapers. The latter reflects a return to a time before air travel, when a party’s message was amplified by local voices across the US.

There will be more pseudo-­dramas like Biden’s running an ad in Texas. His campaign won’t say what the ad is costing — a pittance, by all appearances — but reporters bit for the day on the storyline that Biden was so strong he could win the Lone Star State, which the Democrats last captured in 1976.

Unfortunately, this turn from conventional campaigning will also kill opportunities for journalists to confront candidates regularly on the trail with difficult questions. This COVID campaign format can also help the 77-year-old Biden avoid the usual wear and tear of running for president, while reducing the chances he’ll say something unscripted and crazy.

The new type of campaign can help Trump, but only with a change in mindset. He will miss big rallies, but he has the biggest megaphone of all with Air Force One and the presidency itself. He’s stronger politically when he eschews the role of candidate and acts as chief executive. He treats presidential events as campaign rallies when he should be transforming campaign rallies into presidential events.

The COVID campaign will also allow Trump to dodge questions from the press that inevitably would be about anything but the day’s message. It will also draw even more attention to his tweets, where his massive number of followers gives him a huge throw-weight advantage. The care with which he posts can advance his cause or harm it.

This all raises the stakes of the presidential debates of September and October. Debates haven’t been this important since the 1980 bout between Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan, in which the Republican’s remarks — “There you go again” and “Are you better off than you were four years ago?”—settled the contest.

Trump can’t take the debates for granted; the Washington Post reported that Biden “dominated” Paul Ryan in a 2012 debate. He was widely viewed as the victor over Sarah Palin in 2008’s slugfest, and he has already participated in a dozen debates this campaign, Trump none.

The pandemic is testing both candidates. America has never seen a campaign like this, in which the ability to adjust and recalibrate matters so much.

Karl Rove twice masterminded the election of George W. Bush

Read related topics:Coronavirus
Karl Rove
Karl RoveColumnist, The Wall Street Journal

Add your comment to this story

To join the conversation, please Don't have an account? Register

Join the conversation, you are commenting as Logout

Original URL: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/the-wall-street-journal/virtual-campaigning-raises-stakes-in-us-debates/news-story/d1e2c1972dd3e688bc7b981e22698d9c