NewsBite

Militias the wildcard in this White House tussle with Tehran

Militants in Baghdad fired two rockets just hours after Donald Trump declared the US and Iran were backing away from open conflict.

Mourners at the funeral of Abu Mahdi al-Mohandes. Picture: AP
Mourners at the funeral of Abu Mahdi al-Mohandes. Picture: AP

In the hours after Donald Trump declared that the US and Iran were backing away from open conflict, militants in Baghdad fired two rockets that set off warning sirens at the US embassy.

The blasts late on Wednesday (Thursday AEDT) caused little damage, but appeared to be a sign that Iraqi militia groups aligned with Iran could still play spoilers in the volatile conflict between Washington and Tehran.

The groups have made it clear they still want to exact revenge on the US for last Friday’s drone strike in Baghdad.

That US attack killed not only Iranian general Qassem Soleimani, Tehran’s most important military leader, but also Iraq’s top paramilitary commander, Abu Mahdi al-Mohandes. As Iran’s point man in Iraq, Mohandes played an important role in exerting control over ­militias that are formally part of Iraq’s security forces but often pursue their own agendas.

In the past, Iran has relied on those militias — along with similar allies in places such as Lebanon and Yemen — to act as proxies in the region, conducting attacks that couldn’t be linked directly back to Tehran. Last month, one of those militias — Mohandes’s Kataeb Hezbollah — launched the rocket attack that killed an Iraqi-American contractor working on a base in northern Iraq, triggering the military escalation that led to the killing of Mohandes and Soleimani.

Now it is less clear how the groups will proceed. Some could continue launching attacks to avenge Mohandes’s death, or they could act with the backing of hard-liners in Tehran who want to keep pressuring the US, potentially triggering new rounds of escalation.

“I would still expect a longer, less obvious form of Iranian response in the wider region,” said Henry Boyd, a research fellow for defence and military analysis at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London. “The wider pressure on the Iranian regime to demonstrate its continued powers of resistance and action remains.”

Tehran has indicated its retaliatory strikes were finished after firing more than a dozen ballistic missiles at two Iraqi bases containing US forces. They inflicted only modest damage and claimed no American or Iraqi lives. Mr Trump said Iran was “standing down”, but the longer-term goal of Iran and its allies in Iraq is to expel US troops from the country.

One militia commander, Qais al-Khazali, said the US’s refusal to withdraw troops immediately after Iraq’s parliament voted in favour of their expulsion last Sunday compelled the “resistance groups” to act and form a unified front to end the American military presence.

“The initial Iranian response came to the assassination of the martyred commander Soleimani,” he said.

“Now it is time for the initial Iraqi response to the assassination of the martyred commander Mohandes. Because Iraqis are brave and fervent, their response will not be less in magnitude than the ­Iranian response.”

That may be more of a boast. The Iraqi paramilitary forces don’t have the same kinds of ballistic missiles or advanced weapons to carry out the kind of strike Iran launched this week, but they do have the ability to kill Americans, as they did in last month’s attack at the base in northern Iraq.

Some analysts say Iran has provided some of its allies in Iraq with short-range ballistic missiles that are already a major concern for the US and Israel, which has carried out airstrikes on some of their storehouses.

Iraqi paramilitary groups also led last month’s assault on the US embassy in Baghdad that drove Mr Trump to order a drone strike on the two military commanders.

US officials said they were getting positive signs that Iran was advising the militias in Iraq to stand down.

“We’re receiving some encouraging intelligence that Iran is sending messages to those very same militias not to move against American targets or civilians,” Vice-President Mike Pence said on Thursday on CBS News.

“And we hope that message continues to echo.”

Iran may have an incentive to keep the groups in check. The Trump administration has repeatedly said it holds Iran directly responsible for the actions of its allies in Iraq.

Kataeb Hezbollah, which the US blames for many of the attacks targeting its troops in Iraq, advised against knee-jerk reactions “to achieve the best possible results, the first of which is the expulsion of the American enemy”.

Populist cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, who signalled the reactivation of his Mahdi Army militia in the wake of Soleimani’s killing, also urged patience on Wednesday, instructing his followers not to undertake any military action until all political avenues were exhausted to oust US forces.

The Wall Street Journal

Read related topics:Iran Tensions

Add your comment to this story

To join the conversation, please Don't have an account? Register

Join the conversation, you are commenting as Logout

Original URL: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/the-wall-street-journal/militias-the-wildcard-in-this-white-house-tussle-with-tehran/news-story/badb87ab637e0f4d9f545cba8ca58ebf