NewsBite

Karl Rove

Trump aided by Dems’ ideological purification, masquerading as self-destruction

Karl Rove
Donald and Melania Trump with Colombian President Ivan Duque and his wife Maria Juliana Ruiz Sandoval at the White House yesterday. Picture: AFP
Donald and Melania Trump with Colombian President Ivan Duque and his wife Maria Juliana Ruiz Sandoval at the White House yesterday. Picture: AFP

Donald Trump’s standing has ­improved over the past week — for that you can credit his State of the Union address. Say what you will about the ricocheting, all-over-the-place speech, but as Trump drove to Capitol Hill to deliver it, his average favourable rating from RealClearPolitics was 40.8 per cent, with 55.5 per cent unfavourable — his worst result since early September.

As of Wednesday, Trump’s favourabl­es had risen to 43.3 per cent and his unfavourables had decline­d to 53.4 per cent.

This change is modest, but it’s important to locate its source: Trump acted presidential and struck notes of unity and compromise. If he can keep that tone, his numbers should continue to rally.

Recent events can help him sustain his progress, too. First is the congressional budget agreement. It not only avoids another shutdown that would drag the President’s numbers back down, but also gives Trump $US1.34 billion ($1.89bn) for 96km of new border wall and $US23bn for other border security measures.

Some of Trump’s allies called this agreement a defeat. Most of the President’s supporters, however, will believe him if he says it’s not. They want forward progress, and they’ll get it when the new $1.34bn is used for the wall.

And that’s before the President repurposes unspent Department of Homeland Security money to pay for more kilometres of barrier. Since House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi vowed to give “nothing for the wall”, Trump can legitimately claim he won.

Second was last week’s grilling of Acting Attorney-General Matthe­w Whitaker. What did the six hours of Democratic hectoring, interrupting, demanding, insulting and showboating yield? Whitake­r testified he hadn’t interfered with special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation or briefed the White House on the probe. When Democrats hammered him for not recusing himself from overseeing the special counsel, he parrie­d by revealing he had acted on the advice of ethics lawyers.

And with their rapid-fire, question­s-with-no-time-for-answer­s tactics aired live on cable TV, Democrats achieved the near impossible: they made Whitaker into a sympathetic figure. If this is their approach to the multitude of investigations they’ll unleash in the months ahead, Democrats could make the GOP overreach in the Clinton impeachment look like a model of deportment.

The third event that could improve Trump’s standing was the Democratic Party’s socialist wing unveiling its “Green New Deal”, with online fact sheets charac­terising it as “a massive transform­ation of our society.” That’s not what most Americans want.

The documents admitted “we aren’t sure that we’ll be able to fully get rid of farting cows and airplanes” within 10 years (it really said that), but claimed a decade would be enough to end the use of oil and natural gas, “retrofit every building in America, build the smart grid, overhaul transport­ation and agriculture, plant lots of trees” and achieve “net-zero” carbo­n emissions. Right. Buckle up for the road ahead — but don’t even think about getting there by car or plane unless they’re powered by solar, batteries or wind.

While admitting this would requir­e “massive” investment, the documents suggested “the Federal Reserve can extend credit to power these projects”. Furthermore, the government can “take an equity stake in projects.” (For how this all ends, see Russia, Venezuela and Cuba.) And oh, all Green New Deal employment must be “union jobs that pay prevailing wages” to fulfil a new federal guarantee of “a job with family-sustaining wage” for every American.

The documents were so nutty the proposal’s lead sponsor, representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, took them down.

But the non-binding resolution she introduced repeats many of their extreme proposals, including generating all US power through renewables within 10 years, “overhauling transportation” by phasin­g out the use of petrol-powere­d cars and trucks, and somehow “stopping current, ­preventing future and repairing histori­c oppression” of a dozen groups including women, the “unhoused” and “youth”.

To put Democrats on the rec­ord, Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell has pledged to hold a vote on the measure soon.

This will be more effective if Republicans muster a comprehensive and unrelenting critique that can help win back suburban voters who defected from the GOP in the mid-term elections. They voted Democratic to send Trump a message, not to inaugurate a gigantic socialist nanny state.

Yet a few weeks into the 116th congress, Democrats appear most interested in ideological purification, which from the outside looks a lot like self-destruction.

Losing the house hurt the GOP’s ability to pass its agenda, but could improve Trump’s pros­pects if America sees more of what the Democrats offered this week.

Karl Rove twice masterminded the election of George W. Bush

Read related topics:Donald Trump
Karl Rove
Karl RoveColumnist, The Wall Street Journal

Add your comment to this story

To join the conversation, please Don't have an account? Register

Join the conversation, you are commenting as Logout

Original URL: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/the-wall-street-journal/dems-ideological-purity-aids-trump/news-story/9ed4205f769e0bdd723a862450e04593