NewsBite

A grim property tale of two cities

Young professionals in Sydney must expect to have a lower standard of living than those in every other major Australian city.

Young professionals in Sydney are worse off than in other Australian cities.
Young professionals in Sydney are worse off than in other Australian cities.

Let me introduce you to two young professional couples who society would regard as middle to higher income. On the surface their situations are the same. Both are aged in their 30s but one couple is at the higher end. Both have combined incomes in the approximate $225,000 to $250,000 range.

All four people have what society would regard as good white-collar career jobs covering four professions — law, health, journalism and areas relating to advertising.

Their situation could equally apply to a range of other professions including accountancy and engineering.

While the surface pointers are the same, the outlook and financial fear of each of the couples is totally different, not because of the professions they happen to work in but rather the city that hosts their jobs. One couple lives in Sydney and the other in Melbourne. The Melbourne experience would have been either duplicated or improved had the jobs been hosted in Brisbane, Adelaide Perth or Hobart.

So let’s look at our Sydney couple. They are currently renting but would like to buy a close-to- the-city apartment to the southeast but not in the affluent strips. They almost bought a two bedroom flat on the third floor without a lift and no garage. It would have cost between $1.1 million and $1.2 million. They have been saving and could have mustered a $150,000 deposit without parental help. And the broker arranging the finance assured them he could bump their income for the loan documentation up well beyond $250,000 with a few porkies.

Accordingly they could borrow $1 million without too much trouble. When you did the sums outlays on loan repayments, rates, corporate fees etc would go over $50,000 even if they secured an interest only loan. Then if they wanted children they would have to squeeze them into the apartment (taking baby down three flights in a pram was not easy) and one income would be substantially reduced or high child care fees paid. They must rent. If a child arrives they are exploring the idea of buying way up the north coast and trying to work remotely and commute. But while their jobs are good, their life is tough if they want a family. .

Then we go to our Melbourne couple who have actually bought a three bedroom (they are small bedrooms) apartment in the inner suburb of Carlton. It has much easier access to the city than the Sydney couple’s proposed apartment, a lift and a garage.

They bought it for around $650,000 and apartments in the block are still selling at that level. They have not saved as much as the Sydney couple but, as I understand it, were able to muster a $150,000 deposit with parental help so we are looking at a debt of around $500,000 — half the Sydney debt for a better apartment.

Indeed because repayment outlays are so much lower, perhaps with a small amount of parental help one person has the choice of gaining extra qualifications that are certain to improve income. There are just more options with lower debt repayments.

How come close-to-the-city apartments in Melbourne are roughly half the price of Sydney when all the surveys show that there is not that much difference in dwelling prices? It’s true if you want to buy a dwelling in a leafy suburb — like Hawthorn, Camberwell, Essendon — then the prices are not that far below Sydney’s Gordon, Lane Cove and Strathfield. But Melbourne has a glut of inner city apartments and although some are little more than kennels they have depressed the price of better apartments.

In addition, the state government has changed the planning rules so if a developer has permission to build under the old rules they had better build now, because if they delay and their current permit runs out, the developers will have to reduce the number of apartments they can erect on the land. The land will fall in value and /or the price of apartments must rise to enable developments to be justified. But that’s well into the future.

At the moment the outlook and confidence of the two couples could not be more different. The Carlton apartment can handle one child. If the Melbourne couple have more children, larger apartments are available for $850,000 off-the-plan (that would stretch them but it's a lot less than Sydney) or they may follow what higher ranking executives in corporate giants like BHP and NAB are doing and basing themselves in Geelong where there is good education, family dwellings are cheaper and train commuting is not hard for one person.

While my Melbourne couple used parental help it was small and could have been avoided. The Sydney couple require massive parental help to have a reasonable balance sheet and lifestyle. So if you are a young professional person/couple in Sydney, without parental help you must be prepared to have a lower standard of living than your equivalent in every other major Australian city.

Increasingly the young professional positions in Sydney are being filled with the children of affluent families who can afford to top up their children’s income or lower their outlays on real estate. This is not good for the long-term professional talent base in the city.

In past generations professionals could expect to enjoy much higher salaries in the future so the immediate problems were short term. When I was married 50 years ago that’s what happened and the children of my generation enjoyed a similar outlook.

But in so many professions that is not the case now. The situation in journalism is well known and does not look like improving.

But greater computerisation is going to curb the future employment numbers and salaries in a vast number of professions. Young professionals look at people a few rungs up the ladder and see that their incomes are not rising. Those at the top are still on big incomes but at low levels taking on a $1 million debt without parental help is scary. In Japan there is some evidence that high property prices and restrained professional incomes curbed the rate of population growth.

In today’s world the internet enables easy remote electronic and visual communication so it is not necessary for professionals to suffer a lower living standard if one city in a country gets out of line with the others. If Melbourne keeps its advantage over Australia’s largest city, Sydney, (no certainty) it will continue to grow at a very rapid pace. Brisbane which has even lower costs may grow even faster.

Robert Gottliebsen
Robert GottliebsenBusiness Columnist

Robert Gottliebsen has spent more than 50 years writing and commentating about business and investment in Australia. He has won the Walkley award and Australian Journalist of the Year award. He has a place in the Australian Media Hall of Fame and in 2018 was awarded a Lifetime achievement award by the Melbourne Press Club. He received an Order of Australia Medal in 2018 for services to journalism and educational governance. He is a regular commentator for The Australian.

Add your comment to this story

To join the conversation, please Don't have an account? Register

Join the conversation, you are commenting as Logout

Original URL: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/robert-gottliebsen/a-grim-property-tale-of-two-cities/news-story/984c37bf1e4dd3395c62391128465269