Westpac failed to pass on ‘serious concerns’ about financial planner
Westpac did not pass on “serious concerns” about a financial planner to his subsequent employer, bank inquiry hears.
Westpac did not pass on its “serious concerns” about one of its financial planners to the advice group that hired him after he left the bank, the financial services royal commission has heard.
Andrew Smith left Westpac in 2015 and went on to smaller group Dover, where, according to Australian Securities and Investments Commission documents, he remains an authorised representative.
The commission has heard Mr Smith repeatedly earned poor marks in audits and Westpac identified misconduct including trying to ram purchases by 20 customers of a hybrid instrument — NAB capital notes — through the system on a single day.
This was done on an “execution only” basis, meaning Mr Smith had not given any advice about the transactions.
However, “it was apparent that he advised the customers to enter into the transaction”, Ms Orr said yesterday.
Michael Wright, the head of Westpac’s financial advice division, agreed Mr Smith could earn significant fees by selling the notes.
Ms Orr asked him if he would “accept that those fees offered by NAB in connection with those NAB capital notes influenced the advice given by Mr Smith”.
“On the surface, it looks to me that it did,” Mr Wright replied.
This morning, Ms Orr asked Mr Wright why Westpac did not raise its concerns with Dover.
“Well, clearly, I wasn’t involved in these conversations,” Mr Wright said.
“I just don’t know. I apologise.”
He agreed with Ms Orr that the community would expect Westpac to communicate its “extensive concerns about the conduct of a financial adviser” to the new licensee.