World has changed, our defence planning must too
Blueprints for undergunned surface ships, heavy armoured vehicles and manned combat aircraft are looking dangerously outmoded.
Blueprints for undergunned surface ships, heavy armoured vehicles and manned combat aircraft are looking dangerously outmoded.
It didn’t have to be this way. Since the invasion of Crimea in 2014 and the bloody proxy war waged since then there’s been no doubt of Putin’s aggressive intent.
As the likelihood of conflict grows, so too does the importance of our British links.
For our own security, we need a plan B if nuclear propulsion fails. That means military equipment with range and hitting power. Soon.
This week the US President faces the first big test of his administration’s global authority. America’s credibility as an ally is on the line.
The Australia-Japan relationship could become the bulwark against authoritarianism in the Indo-Pacific, particularly if Washington’s isolationist mood deepens.
The key democracies look distracted, internally riven and unwilling to defend the global order they originally designed.
If Scott Morrison isn’t concerned about comments made by Emmanuel Macron during a visit to French Polynesia, he should be.
These are going to be the most staged-managed Olympics in history. Anyone who threatens to dent Beijing’s gloss will be at risk of rough handling.
Australia is not useless. We have the capacity to shape policy and win international support – which is precisely why China wants to punish us for rejecting its 5G technology and calling out Beijing on Covid-19.
Original URL: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/author/peter-jennings/page/15