By Matthew Knott
The Trump administration is pushing Australia to dramatically increase defence spending to counter China’s rise, with one of the US president’s top Pentagon picks calling for military spending to rise to at least 3 per cent of gross domestic product.
The first explicit call by a senior Trump administration figure for Australia to boost military expenditure would require tens of billions of dollars in extra annual spending and strain the Commonwealth’s ability to fund other portfolios such as health, education and welfare.
Elbridge Colby is Donald Trump’s choice to be under-secretary of defence for policy at the Pentagon. Credit: Bloomberg
Defence spending is currently hovering just above 2 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP), which amounts to $56 billion a year.
With national security set to feature prominently in the upcoming federal election campaign, Defence Minister Richard Marles defended the government’s plan to pump an extra $50 billion in defence over the next decade while the Coalition vowed to outspend Labor when it announces its costings.
Military experts have said the presence of a flotilla of Chinese warships off the coast of Australia in recent weeks has shown the need to significantly increase defence spending, especially on the navy.
The Australian Defence Force announced on Wednesday morning that the three Chinese ships had passed Perth, tracking past Australia’s largest naval base at Garden Island, and were coming close to completing a circumnavigation of the continent.
Elbridge Colby, Donald Trump’s choice to be head of policy at the US Defence Department, told a US Senate committee on Wednesday that Australia is a “core US ally” and that the military relationship between the two allies is “excellent”.
“The main concern the United States should press with Australia, consistent with the president’s approach, is higher defence spending,” Colby told the US Senate Armed Services Committee in written answers.
“Australia is currently well below the 3 per cent level advocated for NATO, by NATO Secretary General [Mark] Rutte, and Canberra faces a far more powerful challenge in China.”
This is the first time a senior Trump administration figure has explicitly called for Australia to spend more on defence.
Colby is a China hawk who has previously been sceptical of AUKUS, calling the prospect of the US selling nuclear submarines “crazy”.
On Wednesday, Colby said he supported the pact but wanted to see more evidence that US submarine stocks would not be depleted by the plan to sell three to five Virginia-class submarines to Australia.
A raft of experts, including former Australian Defence Force chief Angus Houston, former Defence Department boss Dennis Richardson and former Home Affairs Department boss Mike Pezzullo, have also called for Australia to lift defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP.
Marcus Hellyer, a leading defence economist, estimated defence spending would rise from the current $56 billion annually to a nominal $130 billion a year in a decade, if funding increased to 3 per cent of GDP.
Defence spending is projected to rise from 2.02 per cent of GDP this year to 2.33 per cent by 2033-34 under the government’s projections.
Marles said the government had increased defence spending significantly above the levels forecast by the previous Coalition government.
“The budget papers show the Albanese government is increasing defence spending to record level,” he said. “We have provided an additional $50 billion over the decade since we came to office.”
Opposition defence spokesman Andrew Hastie pledged to go further.
“The Coalition has long been calling for a greater increase to defence spending. A Dutton-led government will increase defence spending above its current level to meet the challenges of our strategic environment,” he said.
However, the Coalition has not outlined its plans, and party insiders reject speculation that Opposition Leader Peter Dutton would be able to go as high as 3 per cent of GDP.
Peter Dean, who co-authored the government’s defence strategic review, said Colby’s comments were “entirely in line with the Trump administration’s thinking”.
“Percentage of GDP is a very crude measure, but it signals intent and it reflects the absolute need to spend more on defence in a time of major power strategic competition, a changing global order and international disruption,” Dean said.
Lowy Institute executive director Michael Fullilove backed Colby’s intervention, arguing current defence spending was inadequate because the US looks increasingly unreliable, China is asserting itself and AUKUS is stretching the defence budget.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer last week announced he would boost UK defence spending from the current 2.3 per cent of GDP to 2.5 per cent by 2027, with a plan to reach 3 per cent by 2029.
Starmer said he regretted cutting foreign aid to pay for the increase but that “the defence and security of the British people must always come first”.
Trump did not mention Australia by name in his State of the Union-style address to Congress on Wednesday, as he name-checked India and South Korea as nations he believed were taking advantage of the US on trade.
Cut through the noise of federal politics with news, views and expert analysis. Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter.