NewsBite

Advertisement

This was published 6 months ago

ACTU head Sally McManus silent on John Setka’s threats and insults

By Angus Thompson and Andrew Wu
Updated

ACTU head Sally McManus is refusing to condemn John Setka’s threats against the AFL as the militant unionist’s bid to oust former construction watchdog Stephen McBurney from his umpiring job is backed in by his national counterpart.

Construction, Forestry, and Maritime Employees’ Union national secretary Zach Smith foreshadowed discussion of a national campaign against the AFL unless McBurney is sacked from his role as head of umpires after league chief executive Andrew Dillon stared down Setka’s threat.

ACTU secretary Sally McManus has refused to weigh in over Setka’s demand.

ACTU secretary Sally McManus has refused to weigh in over Setka’s demand.Credit: Dominic Lorrimer

“As the head of the disgraced [Australian Building and Construction Commission], Stephen McBurney brought untold misery to the lives of workers he unfairly demonised and the branch is very rightly expressing the genuine anger of its members,” Smith said on Friday.

“The national union is yet to discuss potential action against the AFL, but there’s zero doubt the pain the ABCC caused under McBurney is still being deeply felt by construction workers across Australia.”

The Albanese government disbanded the commission in late 2022 over accusations the Coalition-created agency was more preoccupied with prosecuting the CFMEU than protecting workers.

Setka this week threatened his members would delay AFL construction projects unless McBurney was fired, prompting Workplace Relations Minister Tony Burke to warn the branch secretary’s plans were potentially unlawful.

CFMEU Victoria boss John Setka and AFL head of umpiring Stephen McBurney.

CFMEU Victoria boss John Setka and AFL head of umpiring Stephen McBurney.Credit: AFR

Projects that could be affected include a new, yet-to-be-approved $715 million stadium in Hobart, where the league’s 19th club the Tasmania Devils will play, and Adelaide’s new $100 million headquarters at Thebarton.

Comment was sought from ACTU secretary Sally McManus, who celebrated the abolition of the commission, but she declined to speak on the matter.

Advertisement

McBurney also declined to comment when contacted.

Speaking in Sydney on Friday morning, Prime Minister Albanese said it was up to the AFL to decide who it employed after Setka earlier warned him to stay out of his dispute with the league.

“I know you seem to be very interested in this bloke, it is none of his business what occurs with the AFL, that is a matter for the AFL,” he said.

Asked if it was “thuggery” to try and unseat McBurney, Albanese said: “It is a matter for the AFL. John Setka is someone whose behaviour led me to expel him from the Labor Party.”

In an interview with Melbourne radio station 3AW on Friday morning, Dillon said McBurney would be “staying at the AFL”, and even suggested he was in line for a promotion.

“He started in his role only quite recently, but he’s had a massive impact, and he’s been really good for the AFL and really good for the umpires,” Dillon said.

CFMEU national secretary Zach Smith has backed Setka’s stance and will discuss a national campaign at a union meeting next week.

CFMEU national secretary Zach Smith has backed Setka’s stance and will discuss a national campaign at a union meeting next week.Credit: Alex Ellinghausen

Contacted after Dillon’s interview, Setka said he would be next week seeking national support for the campaign, which he said also had the backing of the Victorian branches of the Electrical Trades Union, the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union, and the plumbers’ union.

He described Dillon as a “dickhead” and attacked his pedigree as a former student of the well-heeled Melbourne private school Xavier College. “It’s a rich little f---ing boys’ club, and they wouldn’t have a clue,” he said of AFL executives.

Burke said during a press conference in Sydney on Thursday that any organised work ban conducted outside a bargaining period would not be legally protected.

Loading

University of Sydney labour law professor Shae McCrystal also said the plans to work to rule constituted unprotected industrial action, and could potentially amount to adverse action under the Fair Work Act, as well as a secondary boycott under consumer laws.

Setka said his members would continue to work overtime but “we won’t be going beyond the call of duty”, adding members couldn’t be made to work Sundays and rostered days off. He said action would be left up to members. “It will happen organically,” he said.

With Olivia Ireland

Start the day with a summary of the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.

Most Viewed in Sport

Loading

Original URL: https://www.theage.com.au/link/follow-20170101-p5jlse