NewsBite

Advertisement

Board should consider clawing back childcare CEO bonus, shareholders say

By Elias Visontay
Updated

The board of the ASX-listed childcare provider that employed an accused sexual abuser has been criticised for lacking “sufficient expertise” to oversee child safety, with shareholder advisers questioning the CEO’s multimillion-dollar pay packet amid rising reputational and financial challenges.

Roughly $120 million has been wiped off the market capitalisation of G8 Education in the two days since confidence in the childcare sector was rocked by allegations that Joshua Dale Brown committed multiple child sexual abuse offences while working at a range of early education facilities across Victoria, including at G8’s Creative Garden Point Cook, from 2017 until this May.

G8’s chief executive Pejman Okhovat received remuneration totalling $3.3 million in 2024.

G8’s chief executive Pejman Okhovat received remuneration totalling $3.3 million in 2024.Credit: Glenn Campbell

The revelations have so far led to a wave of snap reforms in Victoria to apply greater pressure on childcare providers to oversee staff, including a mandatory ban on mobile phones, and triggered calls for a national register of staff to more clearly communicate issues with specific workers across jurisdictions.

Scrutiny on the role of for-profit operators has also sharpened, with advocates questioning the governance of for-profit companies such as ASX-listed G8 and private equity-backed operators like Affinity.

On Thursday, the Australian Shareholders’ Association raised concerns about G8’s board, which includes former CEO of Fantastic Furniture Debra Singh as chair, as well as Peter Trimble, former chief financial officer of fallen childcare major player ABC Learning, and Toni Thornton, a founding director of the private childcare enterprise Habitat Early Learning.

G8 Education CEO Pejman Okhovat (centre) and board directors: (from top left down) Debra Singh, Margaret Zabel and Toni Thornton; (from top right down) Julie Cogin, Stephen Heath and Peter Trimble.

G8 Education CEO Pejman Okhovat (centre) and board directors: (from top left down) Debra Singh, Margaret Zabel and Toni Thornton; (from top right down) Julie Cogin, Stephen Heath and Peter Trimble.

“While early childhood education providers carry a significant responsibility to ensure the safety and wellbeing of children, it is ultimately the board’s duty to oversee risk, ensure accountability, and uphold effective governance structures,” Australian Shareholders’ Association CEO Rachel Waterhouse said.

Waterhouse said the board’s composition “continues to lack sufficient expertise in early childhood education and child development”.

Advertisement

“This may limit its ability to provide informed oversight of critical matters including child safety, early learning outcomes, and workforce policy. These are not only central to G8’s public purpose but also to its regulatory compliance, operational effectiveness, and long-term sustainability,” she said.

Market sources, not authorised to speak publicly on the issue, said that some big investors were on Thursday seeking meetings with G8 in the aftermath of the allegations and resulting knock to its share price.

G8’s latest annual report from February said the company’s largest shareholders were investors and super funds including Allan Gray, Tanarra Capital, Wilson Asset Management, Australian Retirement Trust, Hostplus, Dimensional Entities and Vanguard.

An Australian Retirement Trust spokesperson said the conduct at the centre of the allegations was “deeply disturbing and abhorrent”.

“We are seeking an explanation from G8 Education around their staff screening processes and ongoing child safety measures, what steps they will now take to improve these processes, and related governance issues,” the spokesperson said.

Also on Thursday, Macquarie analysts downgraded their outlook for G8.

“There is high uncertainty concerning the quantum of potential reputational or financial impacts the incident could create,” the analysts warned.

G8 chief executive Pejman Okhovat received remuneration totalling $3.3 million in 2024. His total actual remuneration, which is sometimes used as a more accurate reflection of pay, totalled $1.53 million. As part of this, Okhovat received more than $300,000 as a short-term cash bonus, and $200,000 as a deferred cash bonus.

Waterhouse flagged that Okhovat’s pay packet should be examined, as the full extent of the reputational harm becomes clear.

“In the context of ongoing investigations, the board may need to consider whether any past bonus payments to the CEO remain appropriate, including the potential application of clawback provisions,” Waterhouse said.

Loading

“Clear and timely communication will be important to maintain stakeholder confidence.”

At G8’s annual general meeting in April, 90 per cent of bonuses were paid to leaders despite missing key targets.

In response to the Australian Shareholders’ Association claims, a G8 Education spokesperson said, “child safety and wellbeing are embedded into our leadership, governance and culture and are detailed in our policies and procedures”.

“The G8 board is horrified and appalled at the nature of the allegations and deeply saddened that they occurred at a G8 centre,” the spokesperson said.

“G8 assures investors, families, team and other community that the safety and wellbeing of every child in our care is our highest priority. We are deeply committed to providing a safe, nurturing, and supportive environment for all children and families.”

The Business Briefing newsletter delivers major stories, exclusive coverage and expert opinion. Sign up to get it every weekday morning.

Most Viewed in Business

Loading

Original URL: https://www.theage.com.au/business/companies/calls-for-rethink-on-childcare-ceo-bonuses-after-allegations-20250703-p5mc8w.html