Michael Jackson accusers get go ahead for lawsuits

Los Angeles: Australian Wade Robson and American James Safechuck, featured in a 2019 documentary alleging sexual abuse by Michael Jackson have been given the go-ahead to pursue claims against two of the late singer's companies.

A California appeals court ruled on Friday, US time, that Robson and Safechuck, who appeared in Leaving Neverland, could pursue their claims because of a change in California law.

Robson and Safechuck say they were befriended by Jackson and were abused by him from the ages of seven and 10 in the early 1990s.

Wade Robson, left, and James Safechuck, who accuse Michael Jackson of molesting them when they were boys, have a tentative ruling that their lawsuits should be reconsidered by the Californian trial court that dismissed them in 2017.Credit: AP

Jackson died in 2009, but the singer's family has denied the claims and described Leaving Neverland as a "public lynching".

Jackson was acquitted at a 2005 trial in California on charges of molesting a different, 13-year-old, boy.

Michael Jackson arrives at his child molestation trial in 2005.Credit: AP

A lower court had dismissed lawsuits brought by the two, now adult, men because California's statute of limitations had required that claims of childhood sexual assault be filed before an accuser's 26th birthday.

The revised law, which came into effect on January 1, extends the period until an accuser's 40th birthday.

"We are pleased that the Court has recognised the strong protections California has put into place for sexual abuse victims under the state's new law extending the statute of limitations," Vince Finaldi, the lawyer for the two men, said in a statement after the ruling by the Second Appellate District in the California Court of Appeals.

"We look forward to sharing the facts of the terrible abuse of James Safechuck and Wade Robson with a jury."

A lawyer for Jackson's estate said he was confident that both lawsuits, against MJJ Productions and MJJ Ventures, would be dismissed.

"The Court of Appeal's ruling merely revived lawsuits against Michael Jackson's companies, which absurdly claim that Michael's employees are somehow responsible for sexual abuse that never happened," attorney Howard Weitzman said in a statement.

The appeal court said it was not ruling on the truth of the allegations by Robson and Safechuck but said they involved accusations of "a disturbing years-long pattern of child sexual abuse by international superstar Michael Jackson."

Reuters