NewsBite

Advertisement

This was published 1 year ago

Minister wanted to ‘double down’ when robo-debt problems revealed, hearing told

By Maeve Bannister

A public service culture of reward and punishment could have led senior officers to stay quiet about the unlawful robo-debt scheme, a royal commission has been told.

When problems with the scheme were revealed, former minister Stuart Robert wanted to “double down” rather than apologise and correct the error, the hearing was told.

Professor Renee Leon, former Secretary of the Department of Human Services, appearing before the robo-debt royal commission.

Professor Renee Leon, former Secretary of the Department of Human Services, appearing before the robo-debt royal commission.

Renee Leon, a former human services department secretary who is now vice-chancellor of Charles Sturt University, appeared before the commission on Tuesday. She became secretary in October 2017, two years into the scheme’s operation.

Professor Leon said the briefing given upon her appointment did not raise any issues with the scheme and she was shocked when she received advice from the solicitor-general that the program was unlawful.

Because it was already established when she took the position, Leon expected any problems had been properly examined before the scheme was implemented.

Loading

In her experience, rigorous processes within the public service were designed to stop an unlawful scheme from going ahead. This includes the secretary assuring the minister who in turn assured cabinet the policy risks had been considered and were lawful.

Former Liberal MP Michael Keenan, human services minister while Leon was secretary, told the commission that he trusted his department to provide him with the necessary legal advice.

He said he didn’t think he could access any advice given to cabinet about the proposal before he became a minister.

Advertisement

Commissioner Catherine Holmes said had Keenan looked at the advice, he would have seen it didn’t include a legal opinion about income averaging used to calculate the debts.

Keenan said he did not give any weight to media reports throughout 2018 raising problems with the scheme because he trusted his department.

Former human services minister Michael Keenan said he trusted his department to provide him with legal advice.

Former human services minister Michael Keenan said he trusted his department to provide him with legal advice.Credit: Alex Ellinghausen

“I had very firm views about the ability of my department to advise me correctly.

“I had great faith in their ability to do that and that was the basis on which I formed my views about the legality of the program,” Keenan said.

He was also unaware debt collectors told robo-debt victims that they faced interest charges or travel bans if they did not pay up.

When the program was discovered to be unlawful, Leon advised Robert that the department should apologise to customers, admit the error and inform the public of steps to correct it.

Former minister Stuart Robert wanted to “double down” when problems with the scheme were uncovered.

Former minister Stuart Robert wanted to “double down” when problems with the scheme were uncovered.Credit: Alex Ellinghausen

She remembered Robert replied: “We absolutely will not be doing that. We will double down.”

Leon said some ministers suggested ending the robo-debt program while not repaying debts or telling anyone unless people appealed, but she felt this was inconsistent with legal obligations.

Asked what could have led to the scheme continuing for so long, Leon said it was possible senior officers asked themselves the wrong questions about its lawfulness.

Loading

But she also raised the possibility people could have doubted the legality, but were reluctant to withdraw such a popular proposal that had promised to raise billions of dollars.

“I hope that’s not the case because the public service ought to have some red lines and lawfulness is one of them,” she said.

Leon said, in her experience, former Coalition ministers would stop speaking to secretaries and refuse to deal with them if they presented “unhelpful” advice, whereas officers “responsive” to their policy agenda would be “rewarded”.

“It wasn’t popular to give advice to the [former] government that what they were trying to do was wrong,” she said.

Leon said the rewards included promotions to high-profile government departmental roles.

She believed her determination to provide “frank and fearless” advice to former coalition government ministers contributed to her employment being terminated in 2019.

AAP

Lifeline 13 11 14

beyondblue 1300 22 4636

Cut through the noise of federal politics with news, views and expert analysis from Jacqueline Maley. Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter here.

Most Viewed in Politics

Loading

Original URL: https://www.smh.com.au/link/follow-20170101-p5cod5