NewsBite

Gough Whitlam-flavoured coal plan won’t work

Despite trainee treasurer Jim Chalmers’ slavish adoration of Paul Keating, the Albanese government is shaping up far more like a replay of Whitlam than of Hawke-Keating.

Cutting the price of coal into a station – if indeed you even achieve that – won’t cut the electricity price, just cut the stations losses.
Cutting the price of coal into a station – if indeed you even achieve that – won’t cut the electricity price, just cut the stations losses.

It’s beginning to look a lot like Whitlam mess Version 2.0.

Despite trainee treasurer Jim Chalmers’ slavish adoration of Paul Keating – a former editor of mine would describe Chalmers’ prime qualification as “having a PhD in Paul Keating” – the Albanese government is shaping up far more like a replay of Whitlam than of Hawke-Keating, or even its somewhat poor cousin, the subsequent solo Keating version.

This would be at least ironic. Keating – and even more, Bob Hawke – came to power in 1983 with an absolute determination not to replay the Whitlam catastrophe. Hardly irrationally so: who’d deliberately put their hand up for just three years?

Well, just maybe our peripatetic PM – indeed arguably the most peripatetic in our entire history – might be, however unknowingly, in the process of doing exactly that.

Treasurer Jim Chalmers. Picture: NCA NewsWire / Damian Shaw
Treasurer Jim Chalmers. Picture: NCA NewsWire / Damian Shaw

No, the incoming Albanese-Bowen-Chalmers government didn’t go on an immediate spending spree in the October budget. But then, neither did Whitlam, in the first year – the really crazy spending came later.

More immediately, the incoming Albanese government didn’t exactly play fiscal Scrooge either. About $144bn dropped into its lap out of a commodity boom blue sky; and what did they do with it? They basically allowed the bigger chunk of it to be spent – true, sure, on “essential commitments”. So, when Chalmers moans, as he did again this week, about the “trillion dollars of debt inherited”, bear this in mind.

That “trillion dollars” is fake fiscal non-news anyway. At June 30, total federal government securities on issue added to $848bn. That’s significantly lower than the claimed trillion. Further, and the reason I emphasised the word “total”, net federal debt was “only” $515bn. What’s the big “plus” that brings total debt down so sharply?

Why, it’s the $240bn (at June) that’s in the Future Fund – a consequence of the Peter Costello budget surpluses up to and including 2007, the last time we had a surplus, and likely to remain the last time.

Now, I put the word “only” in quotation marks because it’s a mixed story.

Gough Whitlam.
Gough Whitlam.

Yes, the real (net) debt’s “only” half a trillion, not the trainee treasurer’s claimed trillion. But it’s still a big figure, thanks to those Labor deficits from the Rudd-Gillard years and the panicked post-Covid spending of the Morrison-Frydenberg years. In general terms, what brings back flavours of Whitlam is the shiny-eyed, “change-the-world-overnight” enthusiasms – most obviously on climate change, with Chris Bowen a sort of composite of Clyde Cameron, Jim Cairns and Rex Connor all wrapped up in one. There’s another big irony for you. Connor wanted to cover Australia with gas pipelines; Bowen wants to close them all down. But, Augustinian-style, “not just yet”. Just like coal-fired power stations.

The demand for state governments to cap coal prices, at $125 a tonne, sits somewhere between a thought bubble and a very bad idea. But it’s got Whitlam and co. written all over it.

I have no problem in the world with reserving coal – and gas – for local use. And indeed, capping and even fixing its price. If, and that’s the key word, it’s done up front; just like the entirely sensible – and bipartisan WA state reservation policy.

Doing it after projects and mines are up and operating is a form of confiscation; and that’s the first step to a banana republic. Further, it almost certainly won’t work to achieve the desired slashing of power bills. Thanks to the – sure, entirely bipartisan – lunacy of force-feeding wind and solar into the grid, coal-fired power stations are price-takers, not price-setters.

Cutting the price of coal into a station – if indeed you even achieve that – won’t cut the electricity price, just cut the stations losses. In sum, 2022 was 1972 redux. Will 2025 be 1975 redux as well?

Originally published as Gough Whitlam-flavoured coal plan won’t work

Add your comment to this story

To join the conversation, please Don't have an account? Register

Join the conversation, you are commenting as Logout

Original URL: https://www.ntnews.com.au/business/terry-mccrann/gough-whitlamflavoured-coal-plan-wont-work/news-story/98ba619bcd4f5a0db9ba560816fa091a