NewsBite

First pictures of Russia’s doomed warship

Pictures have emerged of the wreckage of Putin’s flagship that Ukraine and the US says was sunk by Ukrainian forces.

Jamie SeidelJamie Seidel
@JamieSeidel
5 min read
April 18, 2022 - 12:20PM
Fears Russian warship Moskva was carrying nuclear weapons

The first pictures of Russia’s wrecked guided-missile cruiser Moskva reveal a ship unready for action and doomed by raging internal fires.

The fate of President Vladimir Putin’s Black Sea Fleet flagship has been confirmed with verified pictures showing the burning hulk abandoned in calm waters shortly before it sank.

Stream the latest on the invasion of Ukraine from the world’s most trusted news sources with Flash. 25+ news channels in 1 place. New to Flash? Try 1 month free. Offer ends October 31, 2022 >

The stricken warship is seen listing (leaning) to port (left). Smoke is pouring out of the forward superstructure (command tower). And soot along the length of the ship indicates extensive internal damage.

No crew are visible.

Ukraine claimed it struck the Moskva with two cruise missiles early Thursday morning Australian time.

Several hours later, Russian state-controlled media confirmed an “ammunition explosion” aboard the warship and stated investigations were underway as to the cause. Later, it was announced the ship had foundered “in a storm”.

The pictures are believed to have been taken by a crew member of a rescue ship, most likely the rescue tug SB742 – part of the Black Sea’s rescue ship squadron.

They show a warship largely abandoned to its fate.

Almost all visible life raft stations are empty, and the large boat crane is extended. This indicates the crew has evacuated the ship.

Warship designers and naval analysts say the images of the burning hulk hint at the true story of how the high-profile command ship was lost.

It’s a story of deception, poor preparedness – and a ship that never should have been asked to do what it was doing.

Sleight-of-hand trick

Dr Pawling also points to Moskva’s radar equipment as an indication of how Ukraine’s two Neptune missiles may have hit the ship.

Recently, Ukrainian forces claimed they “tricked” the Moskva’s crew by sending a large surveillance drone into its vicinity.

The story goes that the cruiser’s primary radar – which only has a 180-degree field of vision – then allegedly followed the drone as it moved away from land. This could have allowed the Ukrainian missiles to remain largely unnoticed as they dove toward the warship.

British naval architect Dr Rachel Pawling says clues in the Moskva photos indicate this story may be partly correct.

“The engagement radars for SA-N-4 and SA-N-6 both appear to be stowed,” Dr Pawling notes.

“I think it unlikely the radar were carefully stowed after the hit: This would lend credence to the story the crew were distracted by a UAV (uncrewed aerial vehicle).”

Essentially, the radars needed to get a highly accurate picture of the approaching missiles were not active. Instead, they were in their “sleep” mode.

Therefore the antimissile gun systems and short-range missiles would not have had the targeting information they needed to defend the ship successfully.

“The distraction here is conceptual,” says Dr Pawling. “It’s not that they are looking the wrong way; it’s that they are focused on the wrong *type* of threat. This has happened to others before.”

Blow or blunder

The burning hulk is pictured in calm water. This does not match Russia’s official story that the ship sank in a storm after an accident.

In the image, a fire continues to burn in the vessel’s heart. But any blaze at the aft (rear) of the ship appears extinguished.

“However it is clear smoke has spread throughout the after half of the ship. And that stuff is nasty,” says Dr Pawling.

The soot and scorch marks these fires have left behind are important clues.

Possible puncture marks can be seen on the hull’s waterline, directly below the seat of the remaining smoke. It cannot yet be confirmed these are the entry points of the Ukrainian cruise missiles. But they do lend some credence to their claim.

The missiles are programmed to strike ships at this vulnerable point – close to the command structure and deep among its enormous engine rooms.

Dr Pawling notes the cause of much speculation in recent days – the Moskva’s huge SS-N-12 aircraft carrier killer missiles – appear intact. A detonation of the four enormous tubes that contain the port (left) side missiles could have explained the ship’s catastrophic loss.

Instead, the seat of the fire appears to be among the cruiser’s closely packed support weaponry.

Fire and fury

Unlike HMS Sheffield, a British guided-missile destroyer that burnt out and sank during the 1982 Falklands Islands War, the fire aboard Moskva does not appear to have been intense.

“The presence of paint over most of the hull (on the side we can see, anyway) makes a widespread high-temperature fire unlikely,” Dr Pawling notes.

But soot is seen at numerous points along the hull.

“This implies a rapid spread of smoke from fires subsequently extinguished,” she adds. “This raises questions about what damage control state the ship was in. I suspect low.”

Warships are built with fire-resistant bulkheads and blast doors to prevent fire – and just as importantly thick smoke – from spreading.

The blast doors may have been open to ease crew movement.

Smoke could have spread uncontrolled from compartment to compartment, forcing the crew to retreat. Behind it, a low-intensity fire could have followed.

“I would be *very* surprised if internal furnishings met modern fire resistance standards,” Dr Pawling concludes.

Vulnerable by design

Russian warships like Moskva look impressive. They are crowded with weaponry, giving them a fearsome reputation.

But it’s also a weakness.

Any hit on the ship is likely to strike something serious.

“Major damage seems to be in way of the midships (central) deckhouse with AK-630 CIWS (close-in antimissile weapon system). That’s a fair amount of cookoff if the ammo catches,” Dr Pawling tweeted.

Another naval analyst pointed out that there was another weapons system in the vicinity of the main blaze.

“Apparently, the missile strike hit the base of the ship’s bow superstructure,” one naval analyst noted. “The explosion of the warheads and the burning of the remnants of missile fuel to the detonation of the anti-submarine ammunition (RBU-6000) cellars, which were located below the waterline.”

More Coverage

Inside the US Navy’s ship of fools
Jamie Seidel
‘Get out’: Moments to escape watery hell
Jamie Seidel

And Moscow’s ability to fight the subsequent fires may have been crippled from the start.

Based on public versions of the warship’s plans, that’s also in the vicinity of one of the ship’s damage control centres; “So co-ordinating the “internal battle” would have been very difficult,” Dr Pawling adds.

The fate of the Moskva cannot be fully assessed from just these two photos. But what they reveal indicates a ship suffering fire, flooding and widespread smoke circulation within the hull before it went down.

More related stories

Original URL: https://www.news.com.au/world/europe/first-pictures-of-russias-doomed-warship/news-story/df4fdfe99e2c7ce587934b51a619d18e