Scientists meet in Canberra to prevent ‘catastrophic’ space junk collision wiping out vital satellites
A CATASTROPHIC space junk collision that could wipe out vital satellites has been foreshadowed by global scientists.
A POTENTIALLY disastrous collision in space that could render the edge of Earth’s upper atmosphere unusable has been foreshadowed by global scientists.
It’s a matter of when, not if, such a calamitous event will take place, they say.
Space has become so crowded with old defunct satellites, spent rocket parts and other man made waste that a disastrous collision that damages valuable infrastructure is fast becoming inevitable.
Scientists from around the world have descended on Canberra today to brainstorm a solution to the troublesome problem.
Every time we watch TV, use GPS, or check the weather, we are relying on satellite technology. The problem is as we keep sending them up there, the eventual pile of orbiting junk gets bigger. Some predictions claim space could become unusable in as little as 20 years.
It’s estimated that as many as 170 million pieces of debris are circling the Earth at speeds in excess of 27,000km/h. The most worrying part is we only know where 22,000 of them are.
RADIO SIGNALS FROM SPACE COMING FROM RED DWARF STAR ROSS 128 ARE 'STRANGE', ASTRONOMERS SAY
The growing collection of untracked space debris is putting $900 billion worth of satellites and space infrastructure at risk, researchers warn. Without the knowledge of where pieces of space junk are floating, valuable spacecrafts like the International Space Station, or vital defence and telecommunications satellites could be seriously damaged.
The CEO of Canberra’s Space Environment Research Centre (SERC), Ben Greene, said that lack of data on space junk was a major concern.
“There is so much debris that it is colliding with itself, and creating more debris. A catastrophic avalanche of collisions which could quickly destroy all orbiting satellites is now possible,” he said.
His comments were almost identical to those he made back in 2014 when the $150 million SERC was established to lead the way in addressing the space junk problem.
One US expert on space junk who travelled to Canberra called the threat of a truly damaging collision “inevitable”.
WHY IS THERE SO MUCH JUNK?
It sounds crazy, but explosions are one concern. Unused fuel in abandoned satellites can cause them to blow up and turn one piece of space junk into thousands of smaller pieces. Sometimes we even do it intentionally.
In 2007 China tested an anti-satellite missile by shooting it at one of its old satellites, adding as much debris to the space junkyard as over the previous 50 years, according to the Australian Academy of Science.
The collision of satellites such as that between a defunct Cosmos satellite and an active Iridium satellite in 2009 which created more than 1000 pieces of debris.
On top of that there’s also general erosion caused by solar radiation and heat which, for example, causes paint strips to peel off satellites. That doesn’t sound like a big problem until you realise that one tiny paint flake in orbit can be enough to crack a window of the International Space Station.
POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS
A robust tracking system remains a top priority for researchers tackling the issue.
Astronomers also hope that laser technology, which is used to track space debris, can also prove useful in eradicating some of the smaller pieces.
Speaking to the ABC, ANU Professor Matthew Colless said the university’s Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics hopes to use lasers to remove smaller bits of space junk.
“If we increase the power of the lasers that we have to actually gently push small bits of space junk, that makes them fall back to Earth more rapidly and burn up harmlessly in the atmosphere,” he said.
Other options have been explored in the past. In February a plan by Japanese scientists to deploy a space junk “collector” — created with the help of a fishing net company designed to be tethered to a space station resupply vehicle — to slow the junk down and bring it into a lower orbit proved unsuccessful.