Anthony Albanese says Peter Dutton ‘playing games’ over Voice details
A day after an emotional Prime Minister unveiled details about the Voice, he’s criticised Peter Dutton for “playing games”.
Anthony Albanese has accused Peter Dutton of “playing games” over the Voice.
The comments come a day after the Prime Minister’s emotional press conference where, alongside Indigenous Affairs Minister Linda Burney and members of the referendum working group, Mr Albanese unveiled the question he intends to ask all Australians in a referendum this year.
Australians will be asked: “A proposed law: to alter the constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve this proposed alteration?”
He also provided details about what the Voice to parliament would do, namely that it will provide advice to both the parliament and the executive government.
An additional chapter would be added to the Constitution if a majority of Australians vote “yes”.
Prolific “no” campaigners like Warren Mundine say the Voice will be a “disaster”, and it won’t improve real outcomes for Indigenous Australians.
The constitutional alteration Bill will be introduced to the parliament next week, and the government has the backing of the Greens, while the Nationals are staunchly opposed. Mr Dutton and the Liberals are yet to form a view.
On Thursday, after Mr Albanese’s press conference, Mr Dutton said he wanted more detail before making a decision.
“There is a lot of detail that has been requested and there are many more questions that have been posed today as a result of the third form of words put forward,” Mr Dutton said.
Mr Albanese said he’d sat down with Mr Dutton ahead of Thursday’s press conference and had provided ample opportunity for questions.
“We know from a republic playbook that occurred last century that it is nothing more than a tactic, and it lacks genuineness to just continue to say, ‘Oh, we don’t have the detail’,” Mr Albanese said in a press conference on Friday.
“No matter how much detail is put out, Peter Dutton will say, ‘Oh, what about more detail?’ That’s the game that’s being played here.”
The Voice would advise the parliament and the executive government of the Commonwealth on matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
Earlier, Mr Mundine said a Voice was “not going to change one iota of anything on the ground of Aboriginal people”.
“In their words it is an advisory committee to the parliament and the executive,” he told ABC News.
“Since 1973 we have been having advisory committees, and all of them have failed to certain extents.
“This whole thing is built on a falsehood that Aboriginal people have never had voices to parliament. (Community) are concerned that the Voice will be just another group of people sitting in Canberra and the local communities and the grassroots people will lose out.”
Indigenous Affairs Minister Linda Burney said she was “sure” that in the lead-up to the referendum there was likely to be misinformation, disinformation, and scare campaigns.
“I can assure everyone there is absolutely nothing to fear from this Voice,” she told ABC News.
“It will mean better outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, and every single Australian understands that the 10 year gap in life expectancy is not acceptable in this country.
“Every single Australian will be able to walk prouder and taller the Sunday after referendum day.”
Coalition divided
Nationals leader David Littleproud echoed Mr Mundine’s concerns, saying the Voice risked “repeating the mistakes of the past”.
“Adding another layer of bureaucracy won’t work. Indigenous Australians are listened to – they’re listened to like every other Australian,” he told Channel 9.
“You need the bureaucracy in Canberra to get out of Canberra … get into those communities, and listen. Communities should be designing the policies, not bureaucrats.”
The Liberal Party has yet to reach a position on the Voice, with Opposition Leader Peter Dutton on Thursday called for more detail.
He also requested the Solicitor-General’s advice be released.
Ms Burney said whether or not the longstanding convention to not release Solicitor-General advice would be a decision of Mr Albanese and Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus.
“The most important thing to understand, and Mr Dutton knows this very well, is that we have gone through an incredibly rigorous process,” she said.
Mr Albanese said Mr Dutton was aware “that’s not the way it works” when asked about releasing the advice.
“He was in cabinet for nine years and didn’t release any advice from the cabinet. It’s not the way it works, and he knows that,” he said.
Deputy Liberal leader Sussan Ley said the party still wanted more details before they firmed up a position.
“We are still asking for more detail, and I think Australians might be a little confused. The Prime Minister said yesterday this would be a ‘modest change’, but then later he said it would ‘change the country’,” she told Channel 7.
“So we’ll keep asking for that detail and ask him questions on behalf of all Australians, but we’ll do it in a respectful way, because it is an incredibly important issue.
“As I say, you don’t get a blank cheque to change the Constitution. We have to do this well and we have to do this thoroughly.”
Historically speaking, without bipartisan support, referendums fail.
Government ‘confident’ Voice is right
Ms Burney said it appeared to her as though Mr Dutton and the Liberals were “looking for excuses”, and said she was confident the government has got the path to the referendum right.
“I am absolutely confident that we have got the words and the amendments correct. They are simple. They are understandable for the Australian public,” Ms Burney said.
“I think that the Liberals are looking for excuses, and I think they’ve almost run out.”
Mr Dreyfus backed in Ms Burney.
“I’d invite Mr Dutton to have a long, hard think and a long hard look at the simple words that we’ve unveiled yesterday, a and the simple question that will be put to the Australian people on referendum day, and look into his heart and think about tremendous improvements that this will be for our country,” he told ABC Radio.
“If we have recognition of our first peoples in the constitution, and a Voice to make representations to the parliament and the executive on matters that concern Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, that will be a tremendous step forward.
“I hope he can bring himself and his party to support this.”