NewsBite

Millionaire’s court battle over palm trees

Two millionaires in one of Sydney’s wealthiest suburb have been locked in a court battle over palm trees, obstructing one of the homeowner’s exclusive harbour views.

This jaw-dropping Vaucluse estate offers harbourfront resort living

A harbourfront property owner has failed in a court bid to force his neighbour to remove palm trees, which he claims blocks his exclusive waterfront views.

Former Allianz chairman John Curtis took his neighbour businessman Winardi Pranatajaya to the NSW Land and Environment Court this month over the palm trees, which he claims are obstructing the harbour views he has “enjoyed since purchasing his property in 1993”.

The Darling Point home, owned by John Curtis.
The Darling Point home, owned by John Curtis.

Mr Curtis told the court the palms were in breach of an agreement listed on the property title, which restricts the height of items on Mr Pranatajaya’s property.

However, Acting Commissioner David Galwey ruled against Mr Curtis, saying the palms did not “severely obstruct” his view, however, were important in maintaining Mr Pranatajaya’s privacy.

The palms which partial block Mr Curtis’ view. Picture: Google
The palms which partial block Mr Curtis’ view. Picture: Google

“Even from the ground floor areas, including the patio, the palms do not severely obstruct a view,” Mr Galwey said in his decision handed down on December 23.

“Narrow views to water between the fig trees, maintained by Council, remain in places. I consider the view obstruction caused by the palms is moderate from the patio and minor from other locations.”

Mr Curtis is now the chair of Thrive’s advisory council. Picture: Supplied
Mr Curtis is now the chair of Thrive’s advisory council. Picture: Supplied

Under the Trees Disputes Between Neighbours Act, the court can order the removal or pruning of trees, however, they must be severely restricting sunlight or views to qualify.

The neighbour must also make all reasonable efforts to come to a conclusion before taking the matter to court.

He said reasons to “avoid interfering with the trees” outweighed Mr Curtis’ desire to preserve his view.

“The trees contribute to the landscape value of Mr Pranatajaya’s property,” Mr Galwey said.

“They may have once provided some screening for privacy, preventing overlooking into Mr Pranatajaya’s windows from Mr Curtis’ property, but their fronds are now mostly above those sightlines.”

The Darling Point home, owned by John Curtis. Picture: Realestate.com
The Darling Point home, owned by John Curtis. Picture: Realestate.com

Mr Galwey said he hoped the parties could come to a “suitable resolution” with the court recommending the palms be replaced with bamboo that could be maintained at an ideal height.

Mr Curtis purchased the three-storey sandstone home in 1993 for $1.62 million.

The house was built in 1856. Picture: Realestate.com
The house was built in 1856. Picture: Realestate.com

The five-bedroom home was originally built in 1856 and features a grand drawing room, formal dining room as well as a swimming pool overlooking the harbour.

The house is now estimated to be worth more than $20 million.

Read related topics:Sydney

Original URL: https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/courts-law/millionaires-court-battle-over-palm-trees/news-story/5f0154ae3982c62f79c9c63390e82faa