Details of Trans-Pacific Partnership free trade deal released
DETAILS of the long-awaited and contentious Trans-Pacific Partnership free trade deal have finally been released. But not everybody is happy.
DETAILS of the long-awaited and contentious Trans-Pacific Partnership free trade deal have finally been released.
Australia’s Trade Minister Andrew Robb said the details were being released before the deal was officially signed to give the public a proper opportunity to examine and understand it.
The deal will involve 12 countries representing about 40 per cent of global economic growth including Australia, New Zealand, the US, Canada and Japan.
“The TPP forms a transformational series of agreements that will contribute substantially to the diversification of our economy in this critical post mining boom phase,” Mr Robb said.
New Zealand’s Trade Minister Tim Groser called the TPP a “complex agreement” with over 30 chapters and 6000 pages of text.
“Understanding the legal obligations of the TPP will require careful analysis of all documents, given the interrelationship between many provisions in the agreement,” he said.
If signed, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) will be a legacy-defining achievement for US President Barack Obama and his administration’s pivot to Asia, aimed at countering China’s rising economic and political influence.
China has responded with its own Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), a proposed 16-nation free-trade area including India that would be the world’s biggest such bloc, encompassing 3.4 billion people.
The pact is aimed at freeing up commerce in 40 per cent of the world’s economy but is criticised for its opacity.
The deal does not include measures demanded by some US politicians to punish currency manipulation with trade sanctions or set monopoly periods for next-generation biologic drugs at 12 years. Agreement on the pact, which was more than five years in the making, was trumpeted a month ago after intense talks in Atlanta broke a deadlock over trade in dairy products, pharmaceuticals and autos.
The fine print will be important. Details on local content thresholds for the auto industry are sketchy, for example, and US. footwear importers are waiting to see how long duties will stay. The TPP would be a boon for factory and export economies like Malaysia and Vietnam. Japan has pledged to ease trade barriers on imported French fries and butter — products which have been in short supply in the Asian market — while Malaysia will eliminate tariffs on all imported alcohol for the first time in a trade agreement.
Other firsts cited by the partners — Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the United States and Vietnam — include the first commitments to discourage imports of goods produced by forced labor and to adopt laws on acceptable working conditions, and the first prohibition on harmful fisheries subsidies. Reuters km
But the TPP, which will set common standards on issues ranging from workers’ rights to intellectual property protection in 12 Pacific nations, was kept largely from public scrutiny, angering transparency advocates concerned over its broad implications. It is opposed by labour unions and many of Obama’s fellow Democrats, including presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who backed the developing trade pact when she was secretary of state during Obama’s first term.
Some pro-trade Republican politicians are also wary of the deal, heralding a tough fight to get the deal through Congress, although this is not expected before March. Republican White House contender Donald Trump has labelled it a “disaster”.