Subway settles class action, agrees to measure its sandwiches
SUBWAY has agreed to a bizarre set of conditions as part of a settlement stemming from a viral social media post from 2012.
TENS of millions of people who purchased a 6 or 12-inch Subway sandwich in the US since 2003 will be entitled to a cut of a class action settlement involving the franchise.
The legal action grew from a 2012 social media post about a foot-long sub that came up short.
Subway notes none of its marketing was found improper and says it just wants its customers happy.
But the long and short of it is, only the nine named plaintiffs in the preliminary resolution approved by a federal judge in Milwaukee this month will see any money — up to $US1000 ($A1,387) each.
What does everyone else get? Subway’s assurance that it will pay more attention to size, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports.
On the website for the settlement, no fewer than nine undertakings to that effect are laid out in detail, including that franchisees will use a “tool for measuring bread” and conduct monthly inspections at each store sampling “at least 10 baked breads” to ensure each “is at least 12 inches long”.
Some plaintiffs had initially been seeking up to $US5 million ($A6.93 million) for fraud and deceptive trade practices. Subway argued that its rolls use the same weight of dough, but that inconsistencies in baking left some short.
A spokeswoman for Subway Australia said: “We have taken steps in Australia, just as we have all over the world, to make sure that all of our sandwiches are 12-inches or 30.5 centimetres in length. We did make those changes a long time ago. The case applies to the US not Australia.”