Elon Musk likens himself to Eminem in legal battle
Elon Musk has landed himself in some hot water and has compared himself to Eminem who went through a similar situation.
Elon Musk compared himself to the foul-mouthed rapper Eminem in a court filing.
He alleges that the US financial regulator, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), is running roughshod over his First Amendment rights as it clamps down on his Twitter habit.
The billionaire Tesla CEO’s Tuesday legal salvo cites Eminem and his song “Without Me,” whose lyrics include “The FCC won’t let me be or let me be me” — a lament over a US$7,000 (AU$9320) penalty that the Federal Communications Commission imposed in 2002 on a Colorado radio station, Citadel Broadcasting, for playing Eminem’s profanity-laden ditty “The Real Slim Shady”.
The New York Post reports that in Musk’s Tuesday filing in the US Southern District of New York, his lawyers quote Eminem’s lyrics — inserting “SEC” in brackets in place of FCC — and note that the FCC ultimately rescinded its penalty, ruling that “the First Amendment is a critical Constitutional limitation that demands we proceed cautiously and with appropriate restraint.”
At issue is a request by the SEC — headed by hard-charging Chair Gary Gensler — for a wide-ranging subpoena covering his tweets from April 30, 2019 to the present to determine whether Musk received pre-approval for each of them by a Tesla lawyer before publication.
Stream more business news live & on demand with Flash. 25+ news channels in 1 place. New to Flash? Try 1 month free. Offer ends 31 October, 2022 >
The Twitter regulations were imposed as part of a 2018 consent decree to settle a flap over Musk’s now-infamous August 7, 2018 tweet, in which he claimed he had “funding secured” to take Tesla private at US$420 (AU$5.59) a share.
Musk — who said at the time that the US$420 price was a pot joke to impress his then-girlfriend Grimes — has recently claimed that he did indeed have backing from Saudi investors to fund a buyout of Tesla.
Musk is asking US Judge Alison Nathan to quash the subpoena and terminate the first-of-its kind consent decree.
In a court filing last week, the SEC claimed that Musk’s lawyer, Alex Spiro of Quinn Emanuel, told the agency on February 25 that Musk would not produce any documents regarding pre-approval or review of his tweets.
“The intermittent nature of the SEC’s harassment underscores the [consent decree’s] chilling effect because it is impossible to know ex ante what tweets will raise the Commission’s ire,” Musk’s lawyer wrote in the Tuesday filing.
“Even the SEC seems unsure of what tweets require preclearance, leaving only two conclusions: the consent decree is unduly vague or the agency is pursuing its investigation in bad faith.”
The SEC is reportedly investigating whether November stock sales by Musk or his brother, Kimbal, a day before he polled Twitter users about whether he should offload 10 per cent of his Tesla stake violated insider-trading rules.
Last week, the SEC in asking the New York Federal Court to enforce the subpoena said it disagreed with Musk’s First Amendment arguments.
“This argument ignores the critical fact that Musk — represented by experienced, capable counsel — voluntarily consented to the entry of the court orders that established the preapproval requirement.”
“Musk cannot now cast [this] off simply because he has found complying with Tesla’s procedures to be less convenient than he had hoped, or because he wishes the SEC would not investigate whether Tesla’s disclosure controls and procedures are actually being maintained and followed,” the SEC added. Judge Nathan is expected to hold a hearing on the matter in the next few weeks, sources said.
This article originally appeared in The New York Post and was reproduced here with permission.
Deadline for Brissy Olympics revealed
The man leading the Australian Olympic Committee has just issued a stark new deadline for the Brisbane Olympics.
WFH crisis: Aussie CBDs in 30-year low
A new report has revealed the extent Australia’s capital cities have transformed, as moguls with skin in the game cry out for help.
Beer CEO steps down after ‘woke’ backlash
A week after one of Australia’s largest brewers left customers outraged over a “woke” promotional campaign, its chief executive has announced he’s stepping down.