60 Minutes’ ‘reprehensible’ guest Katie Hopkins’ controversial past
Nine’s upcoming Meghan Markle expose has already caused an international uproar — thanks largely to the inclusion of one controversial woman.
60 Minutes’ upcoming Meghan Markle expose has caused an international uproar before it has even aired — with many asking why the program is giving airtime to one of Britain’s most-hated public figures.
The furore has been caused by an explosive 60-second teaser video, much of which is devoted to British media commentator Katie Hopkins — who boasts she’s the “biggest bitch in Britain — airing her unfiltered views on Markle.
“She’s a no one. She wears bad clothes. Meghan Markle is the biggest hypocrite there is,” she says, declaring that “all she does is glow.”
Hopkins’ advice: “Abdicate. Off you go.”
In another scene, reporter Karl Stefanovic and Hopkins are shown vox-popping members of the public outside Buckingham Palace.
“There’s nothing wrong with Meghan,” says one man.
“Well there’s nothing right with her either,” says Hopkins.
While viewers will have to wait until Sunday to see exactly how balanced or otherwise 60 Minutes’ full report will be, that Hopkins is featured at all is enough for many.
Dear Australia,
— ð¹Dame Outrider Laura #EngineOfHope (@DameLozza) September 5, 2019
Our sincerest apologies for inflicting Katie Hopkins on you.
Please realise that she does not represent the views of the vast majority of the UK. We're hoping she joins a white nationalist sect in the US and never comes back.
Yours,
UK human beings
F.....g disgraceful. And Hopkins!!! Thought sheâd rear her desperate head again!! https://t.co/RvTL7z95NI
— Denise Welch (@RealDeniseWelch) September 5, 2019
This is terrible!! No, guys, the dialogue about #Meghan has been racist from outset. Diana was bullied and likewise Meghan has done so much good and is constantly attacked. Why donât you make a show about #Epstein? No - youâd prefer #KatieHopkins saying a WOC is âinsufferableâ. https://t.co/xCGitlWeh2
— Prof Kate Williams (@KateWilliamsme) September 5, 2019
60 mins Australia interviewed Katie Hopkins, a woman who is unquestionably racist and xenophobic, for this âstoryâ about the first black member of the Royal Family.
— Yashar Ali ð (@yashar) September 5, 2019
Members of the Royal Family are not above criticism, but this racist hit piece is an absolute disgrace https://t.co/mon4LcR5jC
Apart from Katie Hopkins' inclusion in this - which is reprehensible - this entire show looks like someone sat down and said 'how can we be as unnecessarily unkind and untruthful as possible?' Ridiculous. https://t.co/LJCup3ytw3
— James Longman (@JamesAALongman) September 5, 2019
Stefanovic skipping around London with Katie Hopkins, possibly the most racist person in Britain https://t.co/knUQnC6Z4z
— Rob Stott (@Rob_Stott) September 5, 2019
“If you have to bring in Katie Hopkins, you’re scraping the absolute bottom of the barrel, So immediately we can dismiss this trash “entertainment” as *any* form of “journalism.” Are there any POC in this doc other than the woman being bullied?” asked British actress Jameela Jamil.
Hopkins, who first found fame as a contestant on the British version of The Apprentice before moving into a media career, has been routinely labelled “racist” and a “bigot” for her views about immigrants in British media, making headlines for calling migrants “cockroaches” and “feral” and declaring that “gunboats” should be used to stop migrants and refugees from reaching their destination.
In 2013, she sensationally claimed her children would be banned from having friends with certain given names she considered to be lower class, such as Chardonnay, Charmaine or Chantelle.
The 44-year-old has also been accused of fat-shaming on many occasions and is anti-Islam, anti-immigration and pro-Trump. She has called the city of London “Khan’s Londonistan” — a reference to British-Pakistani London Mayor Sadiq Khan — and claimed there is “institutionalised discrimination against whites” in the UK.
After the Manchester bombing in 2017, Ms Hopkins sensationally called for a “final solution” to Islamic terror attacks — a term used by the Nazis to refer to the Holocaust.
But it was comments Hopkins made on Twitter in May 2015 about food writer and anti-poverty campaigner Jack Monroe that really came back to bite her.
In that incident, Hopkins accused Monroe of vandalising a war memorial.
It ended up being a case of mistaken identity — but while Hopkins later deleted her tweet, she did not apologise, and went on to brand the chef “social anthrax” online.
In January 2016, Monroe launched legal action and Hopkins ended up losing the $AU239,000 libel case after High Court judge Justice Warby said the tweets caused Monroe “serious harm”.
In September last year, Hopkins applied for an insolvency agreement in a desperate bid to avoid bankruptcy. She had already had to sell her Devon home to cover mounting legal costs.
“It’s really quite sad — two tweets cost her her house, job, and now her credit rating,” Monroe told the Guardian of the legal win last year.
“I’m supposed to be jubilant and celebratory but I feel quite mixed up. Having been close to the edge of bankruptcy myself, it’s a hideous situation to be in, but it was completely avoidable. Things are in place in that agreement to make sure her children are looked after. I’m a mother myself and I read it line by line to make sure that her children didn’t suffer as a result of what she’s done.”
It"s taken 21 months
— âï¸ð¨ð¾Jack Monroe (@BootstrapCook) March 10, 2017
but today the High Court ruled
that Hopkins statements to/about me were defamatory.
I sued her for libel.
and I won.
In recent years, and in the wake of that financial insolvency, Hopkins’ lucrative British media appearances have all but dried up — and more recently, she joined Canadian far-right website Rebel Media as a columnist, but it’s understood the outlet quietly dropped her at the start of the year.
With the UK media and public have all but shunned her, an appearance on 60 Minutes is Hopkins’ most high-profile gig in a while — and she’s so far been revelling in the attention, tweeting that it was “not bad for a woman without a platform or media voice” to be “trending in Australia and UK”.