NewsBite

Mark Robinson: MRP has made the wrong decision on Dangerfield’s tackle

GEELONG has accepted Patrick Dangerfield’s one-week ban. MARK ROBINSON says the MRP made a bad call — which might embarrass the AFL on Brownlow night.

Patrick Dangerfield’s tackle wasn’t malicious or loaded with intent to hurt. Picture: AAP Image/Julian Smith
Patrick Dangerfield’s tackle wasn’t malicious or loaded with intent to hurt. Picture: AAP Image/Julian Smith

GEELONG star Patrick Dangerfield is now ineligible for this year’s Brownlow Medal.

Today, Herald Sun chief football writer Mark Robinson spelt out why he believes the AFL’s match review panel made a mistake in charging the star Cat.

-----------------------------------------------------

IN nine weeks when Patrick Dangerfield polls the most votes on Brownlow Medal night, the AFL will be embarrassed.

On Monday, the MRP made a wrong decision.

The AFL should have corrected it and, seriously, there’s no point saying the MRP is an independent body because nobody believes the AFL doesn’t interfere in decision making anyway.

JAY CLARK: DANGER ON WRONG SIDE OF LINE

Unless the AFL appeals against the decision today — unlikely — then the AFL is satisfied with Monday’s decision.

That the head is sacrosanct is now the 11th Commandment.

Even if it’s an accident.

What exactly did Dangerfield do wrong?

Macca’s take.
Macca’s take.

DANGER: MRP CHALLENGE? TEAM FIRST

BROWNLOW: IT’S DUSTY’S TO LOSE

ROBBO: WHY DANGER HAS NO CASE TO ANSWER

‘FAIR TACKLE’: DANGER ON THE INCIDENT

JON RALPH: TIME TO DITCH ‘ARCHAIC’ BROWNLOW SYSTEM

He tackled Matthew Kreuzer, took hold of an arm and wrapped the other around Kreuzer, in a tackle coach Chris Scott described as exactly how his players are taught to tackle. Dangerfield even said after the match, when asked by reporters, that he couldn’t remember the incident such was its regularity in a football game.

Dangerfield took the falling Carlton big man to the ground and, he said, tried to roll Kreuzer to protect him. In fact, Dangerfield in motion was executing a duty of care.

It wasn’t malicious or loaded with intent to hurt.

Never reported in 196 games, Dangerfield has rarely, if ever, shown the propensity to physically hurt a player.

Patrick Dangerfield signs an autograph for a young fan as he leaves Simonds Stadium. Picture: Peter Ristevski
Patrick Dangerfield signs an autograph for a young fan as he leaves Simonds Stadium. Picture: Peter Ristevski

The outcome is more important than the action in today’s football. If Kreuzer wasn’t hurt, we wouldn’t be here. He was and, of course, there should be concern for head trauma.

But accidents do happen in football. Dangerfield wasn’t unreasonable in his actions and, to the point, believed Kreuzer still had the ball in his hand and Dangerfield actually appealed for a free kick for incorrect disposal.

That’s not the mind of a vicious player, your honour.

Just maybe, Kreuzer might have a low threshold to concussion. Maybe, it was low impact, but the outcome meant the MRP had to say it was medium impact. Maybe, it was damned unlucky.

We ask these players to go a million miles an hour, we abuse them when they’re soft, and when a player lays a tackle which unfortunately concusses another player, the world wants blood.

The penalty is out of whack.

A Brownlow Medal could now be lost because of a tackle which became an accident.

And imagine the PR disaster if Dangerfield — as the reigning medallist — presents this year’s Brownlow to a bloke who polled fewer votes than him.

mark.robinson@news.com.au

Add your comment to this story

To join the conversation, please Don't have an account? Register

Join the conversation, you are commenting as Logout

Original URL: https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/expert-opinion/mark-robinson/mark-robinson-mrp-has-made-the-wrong-decision-on-dangerfields-tackle/news-story/4ad5e06ce3ed3da2cafc52068ed54756