Rita Panahi: We can’t ignore China’s role in this virus tragedy
Forget the snivelling deference of WHO and the work of communist propagandists — China’s central role in the coronavirus tragedy must never be forgotten, writes Rita Panahi.
Rita Panahi
Don't miss out on the headlines from Rita Panahi. Followed categories will be added to My News.
The Chinese regime has, through its ineptitude, dishonesty and recklessness, unleashed a virus that will leave tens of thousands dead and likely cause a global recession.
China not only lied, destroyed evidence and allowed the virus to spread but it arrested doctors who in December tried to warn the world about what was happening in Wuhan.
At least one of the doctors arrested and accused of “fabricating, disseminating and spreading rumours” has since died, reportedly from the disease.
Other domestic critics of China’s response to the virus have “vanished” including tycoon Ren Zhiqiang.
And the World Health Organisation uncritically believed China’s word instead of properly investigating the outbreak.
As late as mid-January WHO was disseminating Chinese propaganda: “Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) identified in Wuhan, China.”
WHO’s complicity is extensive; it has praised China’s response and pushed its preferred narratives while ignoring the regime’s malfeasance.
China’s cover-up included destroying lab samples that established in December the cause of unexplained viral infections in the Hubei province.
How many lives would have been saved if China had listened to experts instead of silencing them?
A study by the University of Southampton suggests China could have prevented 95 per cent of infections if it had implemented tough measures three weeks earlier.
But the regime only took decisive action to contain the virus four weeks after arresting doctors and other whistleblowers.
Meanwhile, WHO refused to declare a pandemic until last week and as late as February it parroted China in criticising travel restrictions.
When Donald Trump and Scott Morrison implemented travel bans against China in late January, they did so against WHO advice.
Indeed WHO chief, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, said travel bans would “unnecessarily interfere with international travel and trade” and could “have the effect of increasing fear and stigma, with little public health benefit”.
And he praised China’s “transparency” while claiming the virus’s spread was “minimal and slow”.
We now know just how wrong he was with immunologists saying the decision to close borders was crucial in slowing the spread of the disease.
How many other countries would have closed their borders if WHO had encouraged bans instead of condemning them?
How many would be spared loss and suffering if WHO did its job instead of lecturing the world about not referring to the Chinese origins of the disease?
If we want to stop the next pandemic it’s important to hold China’s feet to the fire and ensure they take meaningful measures to mitigate the risks of another crisis.
COVID-19 or Wuhan coronavirus is not the first pandemic to originate from a Chinese wet market.
SARS and Bird Flu also originated from wet markets where livestock, sea life and wild animals are kept and killed in horrific conditions.
The cruelty of wet markets, that sees exotic animals like pangolins and civets along with cats, dogs and wolf pups kept and killed in filthy conditions, is well known.
But the markets and the wider wildlife meat trade are also central to spreading disease.
China pledged to crack down on illegal wildlife markets after the SARS epidemic of 2002 to 2004. But the enforcement was relaxed and the country’s Wildlife Protection Laws are considered a joke.
China’s propaganda campaign hasn’t been restricted to lying to WHO. The regime has also pushed back against any notion that it mishandled the crisis and is responsible for the global mayhem.
At home, China sent hundreds of propagandists, employed by its Central Propaganda Department, to Wuhan to “strengthen public opinion guidance”.
But the regime’s efforts overseas are just as nefarious.
The current message being pushed is that China’s response to the virus was impeccable while the US is responsible for the virus’s spread.
The deputy director of China’s Foreign Ministry Information Department, Lijian Zhao, even claimed the Wuhan coronavirus originated in the US.
That is why Trump refer to the virus’s real origins despite the hysterical reaction from the media.
The number of journalists in the West volunteering to be China’s useful idiots, praising the country’s response and condemning any references to COVID-19’s origins, has been staggering.
Much of the US media, who up until recently were referring to the Chinese or Wuhan coronavirus, now claim that Trump’s use of the terms is racist.
If it damages Trump, they are happy to back a brutal regime that executes dissidents, locks up religious minorities and, this week, expelled American journalists.
Rita Panahi is a Herald Sun columnist