Bomber Thompson, Bitcoin and crypto-nite

MARK ‘Bomber’ Thompson has been actively investing in cryptocurrency Bitcoin for the last 10 months and made almost $7 million from the sale of his Armstrong Creek development. But has Bomber really struck it rich, asks Peter Judd.

BOMBER Thompson has always been an enigmatic figure.

He was mysterious even when he was the premiership coach of Geelong Football Club, shunning media scrutiny and keeping himself very much to himself.

MORE NEWS:

PUSH FOR AUSTRALIA DAY CHANGES FROM GREENS MP

CAN BERNARD TOMIC SAVE HIMSELF FROM HIMSELF?

TWO STABBED IN FLINDERS ST, MELBOURNE

I don’t want to talk about Bomber’s recent brush with the law over drugs allegedly found at his Port Melbourne property, even though that is shaping as one helluva mystery.

The mystery unravelling for me is Bomber’s recent passion for trading Bitcoin, the virtual currency built on complex math that ensures its scarcity.

Mark Thompson has been busy. Picture: Wayne Ludbey

Footy legend Bomber has been speculating on the cryptocurrency markets since early last year, telling News Corp in December that he had been “actively investing for 10 months”.

“For the first time in a while I’ve found something that fulfils me,” he said in the Daily Telegraph.

“I enjoy doing it — it’s competitive — you win or lose money and sometimes it’s chaotic and your mind is just going crazy, and I like that.”

Certainly, Bomber was cashed up when he joined the Bitcoin craze with reports he sold a share in an Armstrong Creek farm for a $7 million windfall. His original outlay for the property was $394,000 in 2005.

That was in March, about the same time as he says he started speculating on virtual currencies.

That was when one Bitcoin was worth about $1500 Australian dollars.

How much did Bomber invest then?

We don’t know, although Bomber did say when asked: “You don’t have to invest too much for it to go into double digits, mate — if you pick smartly.”

Double digits?

What did he mean by that?

NEWSMAKERS: MARK THOMPSON’S SPECTACULAR FALL

This got me thinking.

Perhaps Bomber banked his $7 million and decided to reinvest his original Armstrong Creek stake of $394,000 in Bitcoin.

This would have bought him a grand total of 250 Bitcoin.

He would have been sweating on that.

Bitcoin had doubled in price over the previous year.

Would that growth hold before a bust, before the whole thing came crashing down?

When Bomber spoke to News Corp in December, he was a happy man.

Bitcoin had exploded from $1500 in March to a mind-boggling $23,000.

If Bomber had invested his $394,000, it would have been worth a cool $5.7 million, almost as much as the property deal he waited a decade to deliver.

No wonder he felt fulfilled.

Perhaps when Bomber was talking about double digits he meant in the millions.

This would mean his original stake was closer to a million bucks.

And if that was the case, by December his investment would have been worth $14.6 million, well and truly double digits.

Of course, this is all speculation.

We don’t know that Bomber actually invested any of his cash into Bitcoin.

But he was certainly upbeat and far more forthcoming than his usual reticent self.

The point of this story is not whether or not Bomber made a stack of money.

There’s another side to the coin, and that’s the crippling costs of Bitcoin trading to the rest of us.

Electricity is Bitcoin’s kryptonite.

Perhaps Bomber banked his $7 million and decided to reinvest his original Armstrong Creek stake of $394,000 in Bitcoin, writes Peter Judd.

Instead of digging into dirt, Bitcoin miners deploy enormous batteries of computers to solve complex math problems that support the encrypted currency network — and they get Bitcoin in exchange.

As the network grows, so does the demand for computing power — and more electricity.

If you believe the analysts, the energy used to release one Bitcoin into the market today would power a house for up to a month.

Globally, the Bitcoin economy would power a nation such as New Zealand and many analysts predict energy consumption will triple over the next 18 months.

Already, miners are fleeing China and chasing the cheapest power prices across the globe, effectively driving up the cost of power wherever they land.

What bothers me is that a virtual currency has no intrinsic value (would any of us miss it?), but fancy pants transaction security will drive up our power bills.

Unbelievably, anyone can create their own cryptocurrency (the software is open source and Kodak is the latest to launch one) which means this craze has the potential to inflate our current energy crisis.

Who let this happen?

Oh, that’s right.

The people we elect.

Originally published as Bomber Thompson, Bitcoin and crypto-nite