Archaeologists stunned by 5,500 year old discovery from the Bronze Age
Archaeologists in the Middle East have unearthed a stunning 5,500 year old piece of evidence that changes what we know about the Bronze Age.
The Middle East may have been the cradle of the first civilisations, but it also hosted the first collapse.
Now archaeologists in Jordan have unearthed evidence of a major Early Bronze Age upheaval at an ancient cult shrine complex.
University of Copenhagen archaeologists have been digging at the 5500-year-old Jordanian Murayghat site. It rose to prominence between 4500 and 3500BC, an era when smelted copper supplanted stone as the pre-eminent material for tools and weapons.
It was also a time of significant cultural development. Evidence shows the rise of agriculture, ritualised worship, organised governance, and regional trade.
But Jordan’s Chalcolithic (copper) culture was itself quickly superseded. The climate changed. Technology changed. Cultural expressions changed.
University of Copenhagen archaeologist Susanne Kerner says Murayghat preserves evidence of a clash of civilisations. And how the local population strove to adapt.
“A society in crisis, following the end of the once recognised order – without an established hierarchy, and a symbolic collapse without religious buildings and cultic paraphernalia – needed other means and ways to organise itself,” she argues.
Bronze Age disrupters
Murayghat is mainly known for its copper-age shrines and extensive residential settlements.
But excavations have identified discordant clusters of megalithic standing stones and dolmens (stone burial monuments)
A hill at the centre of the extensive settlement has been found to hold several stone enclosures and carved bedrock ceremonial structures. More than a hundred stone structures (dolmens) extend into the plains beyond.
These don’t match established patterns.
The Chalcolithic (copper) culture had been disrupted.
Was it technology?
Somewhere, someone at about this time had discovered that mixing copper with tin made a far better metal – bronze.
Was it the climate?
Plant and animal remains suggest a sudden, dramatic drying of the landscape.
Was it migration?
A dramatic shift in cultural behaviour is evident among the ruins.
“The question of why the cultural and sociopolitical organisation of the Chalcolithic came to an end remains open,” the study, Dolmens, standing stones and ritual in Murayghat, reads.
“The break in cultic life can be clearly seen in the move from many smaller items of cultic importance (ivory figurines, violin-shaped items, fenestrated vessels, ossuaries and basalt stands with faces, etc.) to sites with very visible burial monuments and standing stones”.
But it was not an immediate switch.
Instead, many aspects of the Chalcolithic culture lingered on.
This suggests a sudden, overwhelming influx of foreigners was not to blame.
And coping with disruptive change was clearly a priority.
“People had to find mechanisms to deal with a situation in which the traditional values and patterns of behaviour no longer worked,” Kerner argues. “Thus, new ways to organise life (and death) had to be found, and found within a society with weak hierarchical structures, still dealing with a major disruption to everyday patterns of life.”
Monuments to opportunity
Jordan, between 5600 and 5400BC, was in crisis.
“A crisis that included tangible things like climate and thus agricultural yield, but also, and possibly more significantly, intangible things such as sociopolitical organisation, questions of ideology and belief, as well as mortuary habits,” Kerner explains.
A whole symbolic culture, expressed through copper cultic objects, pottery and stone, came to an end.
Amid it all, a new Early Bronze Age mindset was seeking new forms of social and ritual expression.
This, she argues, explains the rise of stone circles, megalithic standing stones, and stone burial dolmens.
“Murayghat gives us, we believe, fascinating new insights into how early societies coped with disruption by building monuments,” Kerner adds in a statement.
“Instead of the large domestic settlements with smaller shrines established during the Chalcolithic, our excavations at Early Bronze Age Murayghat show clusters of dolmens, standing stones, and large megalithic structures that point to ritual gatherings and communal burials”.
Bold, prominent visual markers such as megalithic standing stones “may have helped redefine identity, territory, and social roles in a time without strong central authority,” she adds.
Among the materials recovered from the Murayghat dig are Early Bronze Age bowls and grain grinding stones. And scattered among flint and animal bone tools are a small number of copper items.
These remains suggest the residential cult centre had transitioned to a regional feasting and meeting site for different tribes.
This would have been necessary if disparate neighbours were to get along.
“The site possibly served as a ceremonial meeting place for regional groups, facilitating discussions and organisation in a society undergoing significant transformation,” the study adds.
“Undoubtedly, communication was required: to negotiate the roles of groups and individuals; and to construct new identities when the old ones no longer worked.”
Jamie Seidel is a freelance writer | @jamieseidel.bsky.social
Originally published as Archaeologists stunned by 5,500 year old discovery from the Bronze Age
