AFL considering bringing in a radical pre-season trade period to stimulate player movement
Players face being traded on the eve of the 2020 season under a radical plan which could be approved on Monday by the AFL before this year’s trade period starts.
AFL
Don't miss out on the headlines from AFL. Followed categories will be added to My News.
Players could complete an entire pre-season at one club only to be traded to a rival on the eve of Round 1 next season.
In what would be a radical change to the player movement landscape, the AFL is seriously considering bringing in a second trade period that would take place between the JLT Community Series and the traditional Richmond-Carlton season-opener.
The Herald Sun can reveal that AFL heavyweights will meet all 18 clubs on Monday to indicate whether the mooted exchange period will be ticked off for 2020.
That meeting will take place directly before this year’s trade period starts at 9am.
Clubs expect that they would be empowered to trade players, draft picks and future draft picks under the most likely model.
But first and second-year draftees, as well as Category B rookies, would be off-limits.
Clubs recruiting players would be required to fit their contracts under the salary cap.
In the most extreme example, a player could theoretically relocate from Victoria to Western Australia just days before the home-and-away season.
Or, a player could line up for one club in the final pre-season match, and then swap jumpers to play against his old team in Round 1 just two weeks later.
The concept was raised by the AFL at a recent club chief executive conference.
The league presented two options — a mid-season trade period and a pre-season trade period — and club bosses emphatically voted for the March version.
Feedback given to the AFL was that a pre-season trade period was “more palatable”, particularly because of the strain a mid-season trade period would put on staff and resources.
Another concern with the mid-season timeslot was intellectual property swapping hands just 12 weeks before the finals begin.
This year 11 clubs entered Round 1 with multiple players injured for the first half of the season.
List managers expect fringe ruckmen and key-position players would dominate pre-season trade discussions.
But Hawthorn could’ve used a pre-season trade period to replace Brownlow Medallist Tom Mitchell, who missed 2019 after breaking his leg in January.
A pre-season trade period would run in conjunction with the mid-season draft, which is certain to remain given this year’s success.
Richmond drafted premiership player and Grand Final debutant Marlion Pickett in May, while fellow mid-season draftees John Noble (Collingwood) and Will Snelling (Essendon) also played in September.
The supplemental selection period (SSP) will also remain, which enabled Sydney Stack (Richmond), Michael Gibbons (Carlton) and Shane Mumford (GWS) join after the national and rookie drafts during the pre-season.
AFL football boss Steve Hocking has long campaigned for an extra trade period to further stimulate player movement, although Hocking’s preference was for a mid-season window.
“We think (a second trade period) is realistic and I say that confidently because the discussions have been had with senior coaches and heads of footy,” Hocking said earlier this year.
“We think it makes the season tighter because you’ve got the opportunity to potentially plug in a player or two to keep you competitive.”
Originally published as AFL considering bringing in a radical pre-season trade period to stimulate player movement
Ablett family reveal details of son’s condition
Jordan and Gary Ablett have been reluctant to reveal many details about their little boy’s heartbreaking condition until now.
Injury-hit Demons stun Crows in Norwood thriller
Struck down by a host of injuries across their team, the Dees have managed to keep their AFLW season alive by pulling off a thrilling victory over the Crows.