Trial flop haunts council as smart meter verdict looms large

A southeast Queensland council will have a report that it will decide to note or not to note which sets out plans for backing a region-wide review of smart water meters after a costly, low-uptake 2019 trial raised big doubts.

More than 800 digital meters were installed at Logan schools, homes and businesses in a 2019 trial.

Logan City councillors will vote this week to decide on whether to note or not to note a report on a southeast Queensland smartmeter review after a pilot showed the devices cost about nine times more than standard meters and drew limited public take-up.

The council said the report was for noting, not approval.

A report tabled last week and to be noted at this week’s full council meeting, details the 2019 trial in which 886 digital meters were installed in local schools, homes and businesses.

Only 10.5 per cent of customers ever logged on to the online portal designed to show day-by-day consumption and leak alerts.

Council officers also complained leading the former council to shelve further installations.

The cost gulf was stark with a council report revealing a mechanical meter averages $120 to buy and install and about $1 per manual read, while the trialled smart units cost $1046 each.

With 115,134 residential meters across Logan and 8000 swapped out annually as they reach the end of their life, Logan officers calculate a citywide upgrade would require capital outlay.

Logan City Council had a trial of smart water meters in 2019. Picture: Logan City Council

Financial arguments are complicated by Logan Water’s leak-remission scheme, which refunds part of a customer’s bill when a concealed pipe break is proven.

However, the council said that summary “over simplifies Council’s Leak Remission Scheme which carefully considers various criteria before a refund is provided”.

So far this financial year, that program has cost ratepayers $67,845.

Digital meters could reduce that bill by spotting leaks sooner, but officers say the savings “are not prudent” compared with the purchase price.

Technical limitations also hampered an important water-loss exercise known as “district balancing”.

Because meter data could not be integrated with bulk-supply figures from Seqwater, Logan Water was unable to pinpoint main-line leaks and “non-revenue” water losses, one of the promised benefits of smart technology.

Despite the patchy results, the new report recommends council note the findings and continue working with the region-wide Water Service Providers Partnership as it commissions a fresh, Seqwater-funded study into digital metering across southeast Queensland.

Industry suppliers argue newer devices offer longer battery life, more robust communications and sharper analytics than the 2019 generation.

An upcoming regional review will examine the needs of households, councils, the state government and Seqwater, and could lead to a joint business case for a co-ordinated southeast rollout.

Water systems are often located outside your property boundary in boxes such as this. Picture: Logan City Council

Logan’s participation means it could piggyback on bulk purchasing or shared data platforms if the technology matures and prices fall.

The council said this assumption was “unfounded” and not mentioned in the report and that “data sharing has not been discussed”.

Officers said there were no new legal, human-rights or budget implications attached to Wednesday’s procedural decision because any future purchase would require a separate business case and vote.

The council said the report was for noting, not approval.

It will not be to settle the long-term fate of smart meters as that decision will be made within a future, still-to-be-written business case.

Originally published as Trial flop haunts council as smart meter verdict looms large