Former prince Andrew demands staff, security before Royal Lodge exit
With the release of the Epstein files imminent, royal sources claim the former prince Andrew is digging his heels in as the king desperately tries to get him out of Royal Lodge.
Former prince Andrew wants to ensure he will be properly taken care of before he finally exits Royal Lodge according to royal sources.
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, brother to King Charles, has agree to leave to property after ongoing angst about his alleged connection to pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and the revelation he hasn’t paid rent in 20 years.
“Andrew is said to be at loggerheads with his brother, King Charles,” royal photographer Helena Chard told Fox News.
“Andrew feels he has played ball, doing everything asked of him surrounding Royal Lodge. We hear he is reeling and wants to be treated fairly, especially as he is giving up the perfectly valid lease on his beloved Royal Lodge.
“Andrew feels frustrated, having been pushed into downgrading his accommodation, and is allegedly now demanding a suitable six- or seven-bedroom house on the Sandringham estate,” said Chard.
“He feels he is entitled to all the staff he is accustomed to, including a cook, housekeeper, gardener, driver and police security.”
Ms Chard said she heard the former royal was taking his fall from grace hard.
“He may now be viewed as a commoner, but he has never lived like one,” Ms Chard said.
“If left to his own devices, I imagine he wouldn’t know how to look after himself.
“It’s probably easier for King Charles to privately pay for his brother to be looked after at this point, monitoring his whereabouts and preventing Andrew from causing further possible havoc.”
Royal historian and author of new book Entitled: The Rise and Fall of The House of York Andrew Lownie spoke to USA Today about Andrew.
He said all eyes at Buckingham Palace would be on the Epstein files release which will take place some time before December 19.
“I understand there is a lot of material on him. I think there’s a danger that a lot of material won’t be released. We’ve already seen quite a few revelations … particularly the length of his association with Epstein,” Mr Lownie said.
While it is hoped Andrew would leave Royal Lodge in the New Year, he doesn’t actually have to go until October 2026 as per his notice to voluntarily vacate despite his “iron clad” 75 year lease.
“We have to be slightly cautious about him leaving Royal Lodge. He’s been given a year to get out. He’s basically digging his heels in to say that he wants to have a pretty large house on the Sandringham estate,” Mr Lownie said.
“He wants to have servants, a driver, a gardener, a housekeeper. So it’s not going to be the fall from grace that everyone’s assumed.
“He’s making the point that he’s got a cast-iron lease, and therefore, he needs to be compensated. So what’s been said in public and actually what’s happening in private are two very different things.”
Mr Lownie said the late Queen Elizabeth and King Charles had their “heads in the sand” about Andrew for too long and it was William who insisted he be kicked out and stripped of his titles.
“William has seen the reputational damage that’s been done and that he needs to get ahead of the story,” Mr Lownie said.
“And that’s why just over a month ago, they realised public opinion was demanding something to happen.”
Mr Lownie said as the cost of living crisis continues, public fury about how taxpayer funds are spent isn’t going away any time soon.
“I think over the years, it’d been difficult to quantify what has been spent on their security, on taking jets when he could have gone on commercial flights, taking helicopters when he could have gone by car,” he said.
“This is why there needs to be more transparency about royal finances. We need to know what the costs (are). But I think the palace realises it would (lead to) a revolt because there is a concern that the royals are not providing value for the money.
“Some, like Princess Anne, work extremely hard. Others are not, and that is affecting their popularity.”
Mr Lownie said once Andrew moved out of Royal Lodge he would effectively be “cut loose.”
“They don’t want the reputational damage. He was kind of this infected limb that was affecting the rest of the body,” he said.
The royal expert believed the House of Windsor would survive the scandal.
“I think as long as they deal with this problem, cut Andrew loose and the public is satisfied that justice is being served,” he said.
“William, Kate and the young family are very popular. I think people are very much in step with what they want to do, which is a much more focused monarchy (working) on a few good deeds, rather (than more) pomp and ceremony.
“We want the monarchy. We’ve seen how effective it can be in bringing the nation together, the soft power, for example, when Donald Trump was over. There’s broad support for the monarchy, but it does need to reform. Ironically, Andrew may have been the person to bring that change.”
More Coverage
Originally published as Former prince Andrew demands staff, security before Royal Lodge exit
Meghan’s bizarre move as dad ‘fights for life’
