English businessman gets massive fine after using dead man’s membership card to get into Lord’s
Lord’s membership is tough to get. It costs $2000 to join, with an $1200 annual fee. There’s a 29-year waiting list. So, when one man pulled a ‘despicable act’ to jump the queue, the book was thrown at him.
Cricket
Don't miss out on the headlines from Cricket. Followed categories will be added to My News.
It is one of the most sought-after and exclusive places to watch sport in the whole world -- the member’s pavilion at the prestigious Lord’s Cricket Ground.
But a businessman who used a dead man’s prized membership card to get into the famous London sporting venue, which is more than 200 years old, was fined $20,000 for his deception.
James Lattimer avoided jail but judge Michael Grieve told him his actions were “despicable”.
Watch the Australia v New Zealand ODI Series LIVE & On-Demand with no ad-breaks during play on Kayo. New to Kayo? Get your 14-day free trial & start streaming instantly >
Southwark Crown Court in south London was told the 51-year-old put his photograph onto a card he had bought on eBay which belonged to a member who died in 2014.
He then bought a general ticket to enter the ground but carried the card to get into the exclusive pavilion, while also wearing the stripy red and gold “egg-and-bacon” tie favoured by members.
Lattimer though was stopped by security. He later pleaded guilty to fraud in November.
The court heard that Lord’s membership is “very sought-after”. It costs $2000 to become a member, with an additional $1200 annual fee.
There is also a 29-year waiting list for membership with 12,000 people on it, the court heard.
Lattimer stood in the dock and did not react as he was handed a 10-month sentence, suspended for 18 months.
He was told he must also pay the fine as well as prosecution costs, and carry out 150 hours of unpaid work.
The judge acknowledged Lattimer, who runs a corporate cleaning company, had been “very publicly disgraced” over the offence.
Jonas Milner, representing Lattimer, argued his client’s fraud had been “an unattractive and naive ploy by a cricket fan who let his desperation to experience the pavilion get the better of him”.