Analysis: Morrison and Albanese’s first clash lands no knockouts
Analysis: In somewhat of a draw, Anthony Albanese has recovered his equilibrium while Mr Morrison looked prime ministerial — look out, it’s a contest, James Morrow writes.
Opinion
Don't miss out on the headlines from Opinion. Followed categories will be added to My News.
Leadership debates are a strange arena where the best way to win is not to lose.
Seen in that light, Wednesday night’s debate was something of a draw – with perhaps a slight advantage to the prime minister.
Scott Morrison and Anthony Albanese came into Wednesday night’s debate knowing both their own weaknesses and their opponents.
For Mr Morrison, it was all about staying in control and not appearing overconfident.
This, for the most part, he achieved, calibrating and dialling back his usual enthusiasm to appear calm and in control.
For Mr Albanese, not falling over with another repeat-worthy gaffe was crucial. Again, a win: Days of preparation and training paid off, even if he could never have Mr Morrison’s command of detail.
But drill down and what seemed like shadow-boxing also serves to set the tone for the rest of the campaign. Absent both the detail and the ability to implement policy, Mr Albanese tried to paper things over with motherhood statements.
And he had a real genuine shocker when he was caught flat-footed bragging about boat turnbacks Labor brought in when he did a short stint as deputy prime minister.
At first flustered, Mr Albanese could only accuse the prime minister of trying to divide people.
At the same time, Mr Morrison had his own moments, particularly when it came to overreach on China, where his enthusiasm for smacking Labor around on the subject came across as being a bit over the mark.
Ultimately both candidates should walk away happy with their performances.
After a shocker of a week, Mr Albanese has recovered his equilibrium, and Mr Morrison looked prime ministerial.
Look out, it’s a contest.