Roger Rogerson’s aborted trial ‘a waste of money’
The jury in the trial was sensationally discharged on day two of the trial on Tuesday after opening arguments included allegations of a drug deal that went bad.
NSW
Don't miss out on the headlines from NSW. Followed categories will be added to My News.
THE murder trial of former police officers Roger Rogerson and Glen McNamara will be reconvened before a new jury on August 18.
The jury in the trial was sensationally discharged on day two of the trial on Tuesday after opening arguments included allegations of a drug deal that went bad.
The Daily Telegraph is legally suppressed from giving the reason for the dismissal of the jury but members of the legal community are privately fuming at what they see as a waste of time and money.
NSW Supreme Court Justice Geoff Bellew discharged the jury after McNamara’s counsel Charles Waterstreet had begun his opening submissions, including telling them Rogerson had shot drug dealer Jamie Gao in cold blood and threatened to shoot McNamara.
Justice Bellew told the jury they were being discharged because “a legal issue had arisen” and that “sometimes these things happen. It’s very unfortunate when they do.”
Mr Waterstreet refused to comment on the dismissal of the jury.
The 15 members of the jury were each paid $106.30 a day for the two days in court while the bill for the barristers, judge and court staff is estimated to be more than $50,000.
Philip Selth, executive director of the NSW Bar Association, said: “There is a process available if a court wishes to make a complaint.”
However, that course of action is seldom taken.
Before being discharged, the jury heard Gao was killed in a rented storage unit and his body was then removed in a silver surfboard bag.