Comment: Glasgow has saved the Commonwealth Games, and may provide the blueprint for its future
The Scottish love a bargain buy and they got one. But can the Common-Not-So-Wealthy Games work? ROBERT CRADDOCK analyses what the T20 model means for the future of the event.
Comm Games
Don't miss out on the headlines from Comm Games. Followed categories will be added to My News.
The Commonwealth Games are alive but are they kicking?
You could understand the relief and mild excitement of Commonwealth Games officials when they announced that Glasgow had dived in to rescue the 2026 Games after cash strapped Victoria pulled the plug a year ago.
For the Scots, who famously love a bargain, it was a deceptively risk-free option.
The scaled down Games, with as few as 10 sports, are expected to cost around $220 million and Scotland was given $200 million out of the compensation paid by Victoria when they bailed out.
So for a lazy $20 million you can buy Glasgow’s most expensive house – or the Commonwealth Games.
The bar is low, the vibe quietly upbeat as if often is when something replaces nothing.
Better to have the Common-Not-So-Wealthy Games than diddly squat is the widespread thought.
But nothing can mask the fact that this is crisis time for the Games.
When you have to go on bended knee and plead for a city to host the Games you know you are in trouble.
When Brisbane hosted the Games back in 1982 they were in a bidding process with Lagos, Kuala Lumpur and Birmingham.
Now finding a Games venue is like trying to find a place for that end-of-year school parent’s barbecue that everyone is happy to go to but no-one wants to host.
The Olympics needed a good Games in Paris and they got one. Can the same happen in Glasgow?
Australia loves the Commonwealth Games mainly because we drown in gold medal glory.
But the Games, special as they are for sports like swimming and hockey, have been in graceful decline for decades.
They peaked in the 1970s and 80s in a more secluded world when television sport was not the all-consuming beast it is today.
Back then you couldn’t watch Greg Norman win many of his golf tournaments in America on Australian television or Pat Cash play outside the majors or the Tour de France.
Compared to local football and cricket, the Commonwealth Games felt big, bold and global.
Now there’s 24-hour sport being beamed on to your phone from around the globe, making the one treasured status of the Commonwealth Games seem less novel and special than it once was.
The Games are not simply under siege from rival sports – it’s Netflix and every other service snatching eyeballs away from prime time sport.
If you are a glass half full sort of sports fan you might well reason it may not be a bad thing for Glasgow to become the T20 version of the Commonwealth Games.
In a world where people’s attention spans are getting shorter, picking 10 sports is not a bad move. They should do what the Olympics do with new sports and go for the one which attract the most eyeballs.
If Glasgow can produce a light, bright, cost friendly Games that rates its pants off we may have stumbled onto the Commonwealth Games masterplan of the future.
If it fails it will be a serious blow to its future.
More Coverage
Originally published as Comment: Glasgow has saved the Commonwealth Games, and may provide the blueprint for its future
How Glasgow ‘reset’ can future-proof Commonwealth Games
The Glasgow Commonwealth Games will feature just 10 sports but officials expect that to rebound in the future as the slimmed-down model revives interest in the event.
Sport’s legend loses mother hours before Hall of Fame honour
Mick Fanning and Mark Skaife are among Australian Sport’s latest Hall of Fame inductees but another legend had tears flowing for a different reason. Plus, Sally Pearson and Mark Knowles share what it means to take their place among our legends.