What you said about Brisbane’s National Aquatic Centre costing $1.2bn, double the forecast
Building Brisbane’s National Aquatic Centre will cost $1.2bn – sparking rage and debate. WHAT YOU SAID
Opinion
Don't miss out on the headlines from Opinion. Followed categories will be added to My News.
Building Brisbane’s National Aquatic Centre will cost $1.2bn – almost double the price proposed for the 2032 Games, sparking widespread anger.
The figure, revealed by Games independent Infrastructure Authority chair Stephen Conry, compares to $650m claimed in March when the venue was endorsed by the state government to host Olympic and Paralympic swimming.
It will make the National Aquatic Centre the second most expensive Olympic venue after the $3.8bn main stadium at Victoria Park – less than 1km away.
It is understood the aquatic centre will be funded in partnership with the federal government.
“The more realistic cost of the NAC which is being put in the plan … is more than $1bn,” Mr Conry said.
He noted the scope of the proposal had not differed significantly from the one put forward by Swimming Australia in February at a cost of $650m.
“We just had to be more realistic,” Mr Conry said.
The infrastructure boss argued the aquatic centre, flagged to become the headquarters of Australia’s aquatic sports, would service the state for “generations to come”.
In March Deputy Premier Jarrod Bleijie, speaking about the infrastructure for tennis and the aquatics centres said “we know the cost”.
News of the cost blowout sparked a war of words among readers.
Many claimed it was another mess ahead of the 2032 Games, while some blamed Premier David Crisafulli for allowing another debacle.
While others again insisted it’s not too late to axe the Olympics completely.
See what you had to say below and join the conversation >>>
WHAT YOU SAID
Another mess
zorb
More of these ‘surprises’ coming our way with OUR money being used for this folly! These Games will be a monumental disaster. Thanks Palaszczuk.
Entropy
Too late. We should never have bid in the first place, but the bail out option died about two or three years ago. Backing out now would have serious long term consequences for future investment and development in this state. It would be like putting up a “permanently closed” sign.
Robert
The only legacy for future generations will be huge debt.
Byron
For that amount of money, just upgrade the Commonwealth Games Swimming Centre @ Southport!!
Barryji Anthony
The actual costs of the Egolympics is not even anywhere near the original cost and the alleged amount of business that will generated is a guesstimate at best. The Egolympics are politically driven and have very little benefit to average Queenslanders who wont even go to the egolympics because they wont be able to afford the tickets!
Premier’s fault
Rosemary
You can thanks Crisafulli for this Aquatic Centre. It’s all on him.
Christopher
New stadium is needed, yes. Payback on Vic Park will be swift with concerts, AFL, cricket and other large scale events regularly selling it out. I’m not so convinced about the need for a new aquatic centre which might only host a sellout crowd a couple of times a year, if they’re lucky...
sunnyoz
Will be the first of many blowouts.
Valerie
The swimmers getting the biggest slice of the pie as per usual. What an unbelievable waste of money.
Hugh
Um we have chandler already plus gold coast aquatic centre is good as well, post Olympics how often u reckon a big event/crowd will be on at a 1.2bil centre, money better spent elsewhere for sure
Axe the Games
Saying It As It Is
Cancel these ridiculous games.
Ross
Imagine tipping that money into healthcare for all Queenslanders not just a handful of people interested in sports
Sandra
Call off the games out of control
Brett
Cancel the games none of these people seems to have any idea To many spin doctors involved in the planning of the games