NewsBite

Dual-cab ute comparison test: Ford Ranger Raptor v Jeep Gladiator v VW Amarok V6

Top end utes are big business in Australia allowing you to work hard during the week and play hard on the weekend. We find out which is the best.

Aussies are paying top dollar for tough, go-anywhere utes.

Many are bought for their promise of adventure and buyers are paying more than they would for a luxury sedan or SUV.

The Jeep Gladiator Rubicon (centre), Ford Ranger Raptor (left) and Volkswagen Amarok 580 (right) are three of the toughest utes in Australia. Photo: Thomas Wielecki.
The Jeep Gladiator Rubicon (centre), Ford Ranger Raptor (left) and Volkswagen Amarok 580 (right) are three of the toughest utes in Australia. Photo: Thomas Wielecki.

Jeep is the latest maker to enter the top end of the 4WD ute market with its ready-for-battle Gladiator.

On this test it goes head to head with its most natural rival, the Ford Ranger Raptor and Volkswagen’s grunty Amarok V6.

FORD RANGER RAPTOR

The Raptor is no ordinary Ranger, with massive tyres bolted on to a bulging body. Underneath, a major transformation prepares it for life as a desert racer.

Rather than rugged leaf springs, the Raptor gets coils all around, part of a suspension retune that includes Fox shock absorbers and an extra 150mm between the left and right wheels.

The Ranger Raptor is exceptional on and off the road.
The Ranger Raptor is exceptional on and off the road.

It transforms the Ranger, giving it a more settled on-road feel, the tail less prone to bucking. Superb control makes it a winner over big hits; there’s barely a speed hump you’ll have to slow for. Nicely weighted steering completes the improved driving package.

It’s a shame there’s no steering wheel reach adjustment, a rare oversight in an otherwise spacious, comfortable cabin with class-leading rear space.

Only in the wet is the Raptor a backward step from the standard Ranger, chunky BF Goodrich tyres slip-sliding disconcertingly on bitumen.

The Ranger’s cabin is a proven winner.
The Ranger’s cabin is a proven winner.

The nuggety tread patterns means dirt road grip is more convincing. Those taller tyres and the higher ride height also make it a more formidable off-road weapon. The Raptor is not only immensely capable in more technical challenges but bounds beautifully along craggy tracks.

Under the bonnet is the Ranger’s newer 2.0-litre four-cylinder twin-turbo diesel linked to a slick 10-speed automatic with closely matched ratios. Fuel use is only average at 8.2 litres per 100km.

The Raptor is generously appointed, helping justify its $86,000 price tag. Power-operated and heated front seats are supportive, while blue stitching injects pizzazz. Active noise cancelling keeps things quiet.

All three models are expensive compared to standard utes.
All three models are expensive compared to standard utes.

A 230V power outlet in the rear and another in the tray add to great connectivity that includes three USB outlets (one near the interior mirror to power dashcams). FordPass provides basic vehicle information to a smartphone app and allows remote locking and starting.

While blind-spot warning and adaptive cruise are missing, it gets traffic sign recognition and auto emergency braking.

JEEP GLADIATOR RUBICON

The Gladiator shares its DNA with the Wrangler, hence the retro styling and removable roof panels, windscreen and doors.

The Rubicon model tested here forgoes some luxuries such as leather and heated seats for mud terrain tyres and additional off-road hardware — for $83,175.

The Gladiator is based on the Wrangler and is the most capable off-road.
The Gladiator is based on the Wrangler and is the most capable off-road.

Smart key entry, dual-zone ventilation and cameras front and rear are included. There’s also auto braking and blind-spot warning, although no rear airbags.

The Gladiator eschews independent front suspension for the better articulation of a live axle, all part of the off-road focus.

Aggressive approach and departure angles make tackling rocks and ridges easier. It adds a locking front differential to the locking rear diff in the Ford and VW, further aiding traction in extreme situations. You can even disconnect the front stabiliser at low speeds, helping the wheels to stay in contact with terra firma, although a narrow rampover angle means it’s more likely to scrape its underside over steep pinches.

The cabin is refreshingly different from the usual ute crowd.
The cabin is refreshingly different from the usual ute crowd.

The capability comes with compromises. Steering responses are leisurely, in part because of the knobbly BF Goodrich tyres.

They squirm around on bitumen and have below-par wet weather grip while delivering a rumbling vibration at walking pace and a hum on the highway.

In Rubicon trim the Gladiator gets Fox shocks for terrific control over large bumps, although the suspension lacks the compliance of the Raptor.

The Gladiator gets a 3.6-litre petrol V6 instead of the preferred diesel option in its rivals. Power peaks at 209kW, but you need to rev it hard, while the lack of torque means down-changes are needed through the eight-speed auto.

The V6 is thirsty, too; claimed fuel use is 12.4L/100km and it’ll often slurp more. It’s partially offset with the most affordable servicing here.

The Jeep is the longest of the three.
The Jeep is the longest of the three.

At 620kg, the payload is the lightest of our trio, so trips away require caution with packing.

There are some quirks: the steering wheel is unnaturally close and there’s no left foot rest in the cramped pedal compartment.

That said, the Gladiator is the only one of our trio with rear air vents.

VOLKSWAGEN AMAROK V6 ULTIMATE 580

If the Raptor is a hardened boxer and the Gladiator a muscly weightlifter then the Amarok V6 is the gentleman in a tailored suit.

The Amarok’s 3.0-litre twin turbo diesel trounces the others for grunt, mustering 580Nm, hence its nomenclature.

The Amarok has the most muscular engine.
The Amarok has the most muscular engine.

And while it’s outclassed by the Jeep for power, the 190kW can be boosted in cooler conditions to about 200kW for short boosts.

There’s never a shortage of easily accessible punch, the V6 pulling hard from low speeds and making light work of hills. Well chosen gear ratios cement its hearty acceleration.

The 7.3L/100km fuel claim is impressive, too.

And while it’s the only one of this trio with leaf springs at the rear, it does a stellar job dynamically by ute standards.

Lower profile 20-inch wheels may be more susceptible to damage off-road, but they deliver benefits on-road. Sharper steering and noticeably better cornering grip make the Amarok the clear pick on the bitumen.

The VW’s cabin is showing its age.
The VW’s cabin is showing its age.

The Amarok also boasts the best payload (836kg) and towing ability (3.5 tonnes), although if you’re towing the maximum you can only carry 263kg, including humans and luggage.

Rear legroom is also tight, although the wide tray can accommodate a pallet.

The Amarok arrived in 2011 so it’s showing its age.

It looks dated inside, there’s no push-button start and the centre screen is small, although you do get leather, electrically adjustable seats for the $79,335 asking price.

Safety is underdone at this price; there’s no emergency braking or blind-spot warning and no rear airbags.

And don’t get too adventurous. While the permanent four-wheel driving system is a winner, the Amarok is lower to the ground and lacks low-range gearing. Those gleaming side steps scrape easily, too, and the road-focused tyres send more shocks into the cabin.

VERDICT

All three utes have their pros and cons but the Ranger provides the best of both worlds.
All three utes have their pros and cons but the Ranger provides the best of both worlds.

The Jeep is the most adept off-road while oozing retro cool. But no rear airbags and an ordinary manners on the bitumen count against it.

The Amarok is much better to drive on the bitumen and has the heartiest engine but it lacks rear airbags and modern active safety gear, plus it’s showing its age.

That hands victory to the Raptor, which improves the Ranger’s on-road behaviour and off-road nous in a comfortable body that lacks little for equipment.

FORD RANGER RAPTOR VITALS

Price: $86,000 drive-away

Warranty/servicing: 5 years/unlimited km, $2490 for 5 years

Safety: 5-stars, 6 airbags, auto emergency braking, rear cross-traffic alert

Engine: 2.0-litre 4-cyl twin-turbo diesel, 157kW/500Nm, 10-speed auto

Thirst: 8.2L/100km

Tow capacity/payload: 2500kg/748kg

Spare: Full-size

JEEP GLADIATOR RUBICON VITALS

Price: $83,175 drive-away

Warranty/servicing: 5 yrs/100,000km, $1995 for 5 years

Safety: Not rated, 4 airbags, auto emergency braking, adaptive cruise, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert

Engine: 3.6-litre V6, 209kW/347Nm, 8-spd auto

Thirst: 12.4L/100km

Tow capacity/payload: 2721kg/620kg

Spare: Full-size

VOLKSWAGEN AMAROK V6 ULTIMATE 580 VITALS

Price: $79,335 drive-away

Warranty/servicing: 5 years/unl’td km, $2943 for 5 years

Safety: Not rated, 4 airbags, reversing camera

Engine: 3.0-litre V6 twin-turbo diesel, 190kW/580Nm

Thirst: 7.3L/100km

Tow capacity/payload: 3500kg/836kg

Spare: Full-size

Originally published as Dual-cab ute comparison test: Ford Ranger Raptor v Jeep Gladiator v VW Amarok V6

Original URL: https://www.couriermail.com.au/motoring/car-advice/dualcab-ute-comparison-test-ford-ranger-raptor-v-jeep-gladiator-v-vw-amarok-v6/news-story/eef95a82a7f033929ae811dcd1558630