11 bulls**t Oscar wins and those that should have won
MERYL Streep, Gladiator and Braveheart have been named with several others on a list of Oscar winners that weren’t deserving.
Oscars
Don't miss out on the headlines from Oscars. Followed categories will be added to My News.
TWO Russell Crowe movies should never have won Oscars and even the legendary Meryl Streep got one she didn’t deserve.
That’s the opinion of Joe Reid from The Decider who has compiled a list of “bulls**t Oscar wins that never should’ve happened” in the last 25 years. Here are his arguments.
‘CRASH’
Awards year: 2005
Category: Best Picture
What should have won? Brokeback Mountain
The most notorious bad Oscar win of my lifetime was when Crash, the paper-thin treatise on racial politics in Los Angeles that wound up laying a blanket of absolution over everyone with the comforting lullaby that everyone is a little bit racist, beat the groundbreaking gay romance of Brokeback Mountain. (Or, for that matter, Steven Spielberg’s provocative Munich, or the chilly and committed Capote, or the topical history lesson Good Night And Good Luck.) Even presenter Jack Nicholson looked shocked that Ang Lee’s Best Director win didn’t portend a Brokeback Best Picture victory. Almost immediately, the backlash hit Crash, and it hasn’t let up.
TIM ROBBINS IN ‘MYSTIC RIVER’
Year: 2003
Category: Best Supporting Actor
Who should have won? Benicio Del Toro, 21 Grams
The 2003 Oscar race among supporting actors was a strange one. The critical champ, Peter Sarsgaard in Shattered Glass, was surprisingly absent, as was the one guy everybody kept assuming would turn up in the line-up eventually, The Lord Of The Rings’s Sean Astin. Tim Robbins was settled on as the compromise choice incredibly quickly, and he ended up winning all the major prizes that year from the Globes to the SAGs to the Oscars. This all happened, seemingly, without anyone to stop and realise that Robbins … is kind of bad in Mystic River. The problem was that he was up against a series of great performances in mediocre movies like Ken Watanabe in The Last Samurai and Benicio Del Toro in 21 Grams.
TOM HOOPER FOR ‘THE KING’S SPEECH’
Year: 2010
Category: Best Director
Who should have won? David Fincher, The Social Network
As a movie, The King’s Speech is not bad. It’s well acted, it’s a decently engaging story, it’s inspirationally stirring here and there. The big problem was that it triumphed in such a stacked Best Picture field, with The Social Network, Black Swan, Inception and The Fighter as competition. Best Director is where it gets galling, though, both because Hooper’s direction is not the best thing about The King’s Speech, and because the names he beat out included David Fincher, Darren Aronofsky, David O. Russell and the Coen brothers.
KIM BASINGER IN ‘L.A. CONFIDENTIAL’
Year: 1997
Category: Best Supporting Actress
Who should have won?Julianne Moore, Boogie Nights
At the time, I was a giant L.A. Confidential fan and was just happy to see it win something over Titanic. But as the years go by, Basinger’s performance as Lynn Bracken gets more cosmetic and circumstantial. Meanwhile, performances like Julianne Moore’s in Boogie Nights shine all the brighter. Moore was able to win an Oscar, at long last, in 2014 for Still Alice, but that doesn’t help Minnie Driver any. Or Joan Cusack. Both of these gorgeous creatures have since gone Oscar-less, while Basinger … made I Dreamed Of Africa. And was really terrible in 8 Mile!
GEOFFREY RUSH IN ‘SHINE’
Year: 1996
Category: Best Actor
Who should have won? Tom Cruise, Jerry Maguire
After losing for his performances in Jerry Maguire and, three years later, Magnolia, Tom Cruise seems to have stopped trying to win Oscars with his movies. Which is too bad because though he’s a far cry from Olivier, he’s the kind of risk-taking movie star who should have won an Oscar. As should, frankly, Ralph Fiennes, who gave a great performance in the dominant Best Picture winner, The English Patient, and yet still couldn’t pull it off in Best Actor. The other two nominees — Woody Harrelson for The People vs. Larry Flynt and Billy Bob Thornton in Sling Blade — were also excellent. So while Geoffrey Rush wasn’t even bad in Shine, he still managed to win for the biggest, hookiest, Oscar-bait-iest performance. Also, great romantic comedy performances never win. A Tom Cruise win for Jerry Maguire would have been a standard-bearer for an entire genre.
‘BRAVEHEART’
Year: 1995
Category: Best Picture
What should have won? Apollo 13
Braveheart sucks. Mel Gibson sucks. Honestly, the Best Picture category that year ended up being a little hinky, with Harvey Weinstein barnstorming Il Postino into the proceedings. But any of the other three films, from Ang Lee’s Sense And Sensibility to Ron Howard’s Apollo 13 to the pop-cultural sensation that was Babe would have made for better winners than Mel Gibson’s orgy of tartan-clad violence. A mere 21 years later, Gibson would end up back in the Best Picture race for Hacksaw Ridge but some of us never dropped that grudge.
ROBERTO BENIGNI IN ‘LIFE IS BEAUTIFUL’
Year: 1998
Category: Best Actor
Who should have won? Ian McKellen, Gods And Monsters
This is the ultimate triumph of gladhanding hype over any kind of substance. Roberto Benigni blazed a path through the 1998 awards season, playing the hyperactive, semi-fluent Italian transplant whose happy little clown movie about dancing your way through Auschwitz was becoming the toast of the establishment town. Meanwhile, Ian McKellen and Nick Nolte were giving career-highlight performances over there in Gods And Monsters and Affliction. But once Benigni won an upset at the SAG Awards and brought his travelling circus to awards audiences desperate for a) fun, and b) a narrative, it was all over. Look at Helen Hunt’s eyes when she announced the winner. She knows what’s coming, and she’s terrified.
‘GLADIATOR’
Year: 2000
Category: Best Picture
What should have won? Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon
Gladiator is a fine action movie with Ridley Scott pretensions of waving wheat fields and featuring a ferocious lead performance from Russell Crowe, but it is a far cry from Best Picture in any year, especially in a year when it was up against Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, Traffic, and future cable-TV champion Erin Brockovich. Sorry, but that is fully insane. Sideways thumb to this one.
‘A BEAUTIFUL MIND’
Year: 2001
Category: Best Picture
What should have won? The Lord Of The Rings: The Fellowship Of The Ring
This one might be controversial, because A Beautiful Mind has its fans, but those people are wrong. It is a terrible movie. This isn’t kneejerk anti-Ron Howard snobbery either. Howard has made a lot of very good movies. He should’ve won in 1995 for Apollo 13. (See above Braveheart rant.) But A Beautiful Mind is over-sentimentalised, schmaltzy, faux-intelligent garbage, and we should all get on board with that. Yes, The Lord Of The Rings finally had its moment in the sun in 2003, but it should have already been an Oscar winner for its first (and best) instalment.
CHRISTOPH WALTZ IN ‘DJANGO UNCHAINED’
Year: 2012
Category: Best Supporting Actor
Who should have won? Philip Seymour Hoffman, The Master
The thing about the 2012 Supporting Actor race is that all five of the nominees had previously won Oscars, which had never happened in an acting category before. This fact was trumpeted a lot, most irritatingly in that year’s nomination announcements, which was the year that Seth Macfarlane and Emma Stone did a whole annoying song and dance before announcing each set of nominees, and for this one, they spoiled the whole category right at the beginning by calling out each nominee as a former winner. We’re not stupid! We know if you start calling out Alan Arkin as a former Oscar winner, then all the other nominees are gonna be Oscar winners, because nobody wants to make (pre-Revenant) Leo DiCaprio feel bad. Idiots.
Anyway, the hell of it is, with five former winners, no single one of them had all that much momentum to win a second (or, in the case of Silver Linings Playbook’s Robert De Niro, a third), so the Academy just kind of shrugged and gave it to Waltz for delivering the exact same performance he gave in Inglourious Basterds. Meanwhile, despite the fact that Philip Seymour Hoffman was a lead actor slumming it in Supporting, he still gave one of the year’s best performances, and, as it sadly turned out, this was Oscar’s last chance to award him.
MERYL STREEP IN ‘THE IRON LADY’
Year: 2011
Category: Best Actress
Who should have won?Viola Davis, The Help
This one was not easy. Meryl Streep is our greatest acting talent, and she deserves to have three Academy Awards to her name. But they chose to give it to her for The Iron Lady, one of her least essential performances in one of her least essential movies, and one that, frankly, makes her look less than what she is. This is Meryl Streep, she’s more than just some Academy-friendly parlour trick where some canny make-up and a wig makes her resemble a historical figure. That is for lesser actors.
Meryl could have and should have won her third Oscar for any number of performances, from Adaptation to The Devil Wears Prada to Julie & Julia. And that’s only counting the ones she was nominated for. (Justice for her Clarissa Vaughan in The Hours.)
The balm on this bulls**t win is that a) Meryl gave one of the best Oscar acceptance speeches in the modern era, both gracious and memorable and a little funny, and b) Viola Davis ended up winning her Oscar for a better movie, so now when we think of Viola Davis’s Oscar, we don’t have to think “Emma Stone white-saviour movie”. Which is nice.
This article was originally published on The Decider and is reproduced with permission.
Originally published as 11 bulls**t Oscar wins and those that should have won
Oscars upset: ‘45 minutes of hardcore sex’
Chaos in this year’s Oscars race has slashed one film’s chances of winning Best Picture – as a racy new favourite takes its place.
Denzel’s blunt reaction to Oscars snub
The Hollywood film legend had a very blunt response when asked about missing out on a nomination for his role in Gladiator II.