- Analysis
- National
- Defamation
This was published 4 months ago
‘Thespian flair’: Unlikely video star at heart of Lehrmann defamation case
By Deborah Snow
The priesthood, journalism or the law – which was it to be?
These three impulses were competing in the breast of schoolboy Michael Lee, grandson of a railway worker, as he prepared to leave Marist Brothers high school in Eastwood at the end of his HSC year.
Justice Michael Lee has won legions of fans following the Bruce Lehrmann trial with his wit and humanity.
His first job, in a monastery, swiftly convinced him that the vows of poverty, chastity and obedience would prove too onerous, as he revealed at his judicial swearing-in ceremony in 2017.
Journalism didn’t last long either. His brief experience as a copy boy in the newsroom of Fairfax, the publisher at the time of The Sydney Morning Herald, left him with memories of Saturday mornings spent at an “early opener”, washing down a greasy breakfast with “a couple of schooners – all accompanied by the soundtrack of 2KY’s Three Way Turf Talk”.
No surprise, then, that the law won out.
Yet he could not have foreseen that his career path would one day land him in the unlikely role of social media and YouTube sensation.
Brittany Higgins and Bruce Lehrmann.Credit: Getty
Video may well have killed the radio star, as the 1979 pop song has it, but it has also well and truly elevated the public profile of Justice Michael Lee.
Tens of thousands of Australians have been tuning in daily as the 58-year-old Federal Court judge presides over the sprawling, at times squalid, politically and socially charged phenomenon that is the Bruce Lehrmann defamation case, an action brought against Network Ten and its former star presenter, Lisa Wilkinson, by the man Brittany Higgins alleges raped her in Parliament House five years ago.
At times, the legal drama has threatened to spiral out of control like a malevolent Catherine wheel. Yet Lee has managed to bring to it a degree of humanity and geniality – leavened by wit – that has tempered its hard edges, along with an incisiveness that repeatedly drags counsel and witnesses back to the core issues.
Barrister Geoffrey Watson, SC, co-founder of the Centre for Public Integrity, says: “In a case where the emotions could run very high, the judge has defused much of that with a very apparent feeling of goodwill … Anybody who’s seen the high level of diligence and incredible stamina of the judge and the barristers here could not help but be impressed.”
Former Spotlight producer Taylor Auerbach outside the Federal Court in Sydney.Credit: Janie Barrett
(Apart from attending a cricket Test match, Lee has apparently worked on the judgment every day since the new year.)
What former attorney-general George Brandis, KC, has described as Justice Lee’s “thespian flair” has injected a touch of showmanship into the proceedings.
Long-time legal observer Richard Ackland, editor of the legal newsletter Justinian, says: “Undoubtedly the case has made Lee a bit of a minor celebrity. He has now got this huge following, and people love seeing him and his sparky retorts and repartee with the barristers. He seems to have taken a vast delight in the YouTubing and streaming of the proceedings.”
When the courtroom was treated to footage of one-time Spotlight TV producer Taylor Auerbach manically destroying his former friend Steve Jackson’s golf clubs last week, Lee remarked drily, “the shorter the iron, the more difficult it is”.
When a barrister last year offered to explain what a “DM” (direct message) was, a mock-indignant Lee riposted, “I am not one of those judges who says, ‘Who are the Rolling Stones?’”
He made short work of arguments being proffered by Ten’s counsel last week that the media union’s code of ethics shouldn’t be brought to bear on Ten’s conduct. It wasn’t complicated, Lee retorted, to expect that the journalists and producers involved in putting Higgins’ bombshell interview to air in 2021 would report honestly and not allow their beliefs to undermine their independence. “It’s like not shoplifting from Woolworths – it’s not complicated,” he added.
Another leading Sydney barrister, who asked not to be named, said the Lehrmann case was “the hottest show in town at the moment”. It’s a brutal truth about a case that remains, at its heart, a de facto rape trial.
Upwards of 30,000 viewers were watching the hearings online last week, as human hand grenade Auerbach stepped into the witness box to accuse his former colleagues of winning an exclusive interview with Lehrmann by way of sex workers, booze, cocaine and expensive dinners. Oh, and a Tasmanian golfing getaway.
But Auerbach was ultimately a two-day sideshow.
Lee listened and then grew impatient with what he described as “allegations being thrown around like a Gatling gun” – a reference to the hand-cranked prototype machine gun invented during the American Civil War (Lee is apparently a devotee of certain kinds of Americana, notably those of the Nixon era).
He was anxious to get back to the main game – most importantly, his judgment, which was meant to have been handed down last week and will now be delivered on Monday, after he tweaks it in the light of last week’s revelations.
In the meantime, the media has had a field day with the hundreds of pages of documents and exhibits that have been dropped onto the Federal Court file – strings of text messages, CCTV footage, a draft of Higgins’ hitherto-unpublished book, receipts and invoices, correspondence, and lengthy affidavits. It’s within the judge’s discretion as to how much of this goes on the public record. And Lee has made plain throughout the proceedings that he is for as much “sunlight” as possible.
Watson says, “The judge can make all sorts of limiting orders which can impede access, and this judge has been really very open.”
There were only two people in that Parliament House office for the critical 40 minutes early in the morning of Saturday, March 23, 2019, when Higgins alleges Lehrmann callously raped her while she was passed out on a ministerial couch (a claim he denies). Two unreconcilable accounts, with Lee at one point framing the dichotomy as the “Tigris and Euphrates of the truth defence” (a reference to the two rivers which in ancient times framed Mesopotamia).
Despite the hopes for a black-and-white ruling by many, Lee may not oblige. As he reminded the courtroom in the run-up to Christmas last year, there was a great tendency for people to assign “white hats and black hats … [but] I realise that human affairs are more complex than that”.
The Tigris and Euphrates metaphor was classic Lee – a glimpse of what Brandis has described as his “idiosyncratic” erudition.
During Lee’s swearing-in ceremony, other intriguing titbits emerged. While a leading commercial-law barrister, he was a director of the Bell Shakespeare Company in the early 2000s.
He’s an avid follower of British and US politics, an aficionado of the poet-singer Leonard Cohen, and possessor of a signed photograph of Richard Nixon, which, according to Brandis, he obtained directly from the former US president.
He’s a lover of history, biography and cricket, and (one can intuit from some of his courtroom comments) is passionate about his family (wife Penny and two children). He sees the law, well applied, as an instrument of social justice.
Has it been a good thing for one Federal Court judge to receive the profile and attention Lee’s been getting?
Anthony Whealy, KC, himself a former NSW Supreme Court justice, thinks it is – “as long as it’s for the right reasons. And what I think he has exhibited throughout the proceedings are two qualities: he’s been very well-balanced in the way he approaches the whole thing; and there is the occasional little bit of levity. But it has never been overwhelming. And I think those are the reasons he has [attracted] that following.”
Start the day with a summary of the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.