So after two hours, what’s the reaction in the US to that interview?
The Washington Post says it should have been a big win for Putin and Carlson. A chance for the Russian president to justify his invasion and for Carlson to once again be relevant after being fired from Fox News. But the interview got too bogged down in a “tedious recounting of Russian and Ukrainian history” by Putin, and Carlson “a master of combative interviews” when he was on Fox News was much of a “bystander for much of his own interview”. He also failed to ask the Russian leader about several “challenging topics, from Russian atrocities in Ukraine to Putin’s attacks on internal dissent.”
The New York Times analysis says that the two-hour interview “was not exactly gripping video”. “Putin rolled right over Mr Carlson’s opening questions to deliver a nearly half-hour lecture on the history of Russia and Ukraine going back to the year 832, followed by his typical litany of grievances about the West,” Peter Baker writes for the Times. “Mr Carlson pressed Mr Putin to release Evan Gershkovich, the Wall Street Journal reporter arrested in Russia a year ago on espionage charges that he and his employer have vehemently denied, but barely challenged the Russian leader and let him talk at length uninterrupted.
That concludes our coverage of the Carlson interview of Putin. Thank you for reading.