Opinion
Environmental lawyers get a lecture in how to litigate
Those seeking to oppose gas projects cannot hide behind elaborately constructed or confected Indigenous heritage claims.
Ben PotterSenior writerThe Environmental Defenders’ Office will have to reassess the way it builds cases invoking Indigenous heritage to oppose resource development after Federal Court judge Natalie Charlesworth’s bracing rejection of a case brought on behalf of Tiwi Islanders against Santos’ Barossa gas project.
The Tiwi Islanders’ case was based on the risk that a pipeline connecting the Barossa project in waters north of Darwin to another Santos pipeline would disturb and anger two creatures of their Dreaming stories – Ampiji, the rainbow serpent and Caretaker of the Sea, and the Crocodile Man – leading to calamity and harm to the people.
Subscribe to gift this article
Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.
Subscribe nowAlready a subscriber?
Introducing your Newsfeed
Follow the topics, people and companies that matter to you.
Find out moreRead More
Latest In Energy & climate
Fetching latest articles