NewsBite

China confrontation: what were we thinking?

China confrontation: what were we thinking?

Australia’s policy U-turn on China came after the intelligence community identified alarming Chinese designs on corrupting our political system. But were they the right responses?

The gloves are off as tensions over Taiwan escalate. From left, Xi Jinping, Tsai Ing-wen, Yoshihide Suga, Joe Biden and Scott Morrison.

Xi Jinping is one of the main reasons for Australia’s current policy position on China. Illustration: David Rowe

Max Suich

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

Australia did not come to its U-turn on relations with China in 2017-20 by the traditional path, as the first article in this series explained on Monday. Our new approach did not define some new relationship to pursue with China or any new strategy – other than bureaucratic shorthand phrases that became transformed into slogans: “push back”, “call out” and “out in front”.

This U-turn came in response to our intelligence community identifying alarming Chinese objectives: they were aiming to corrupt and capture our politicians and political system and damage our defence relationship with the US, hack secret private and public databases and displace the US in east Asia.

Loading...

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

Latest In Federal

Fetching latest articles

Original URL: https://www.afr.com/link/follow-20180101-p57njs