NewsBite

Freehills dispute exposes confusion over who lawyers work for

Updated

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

Corporate lawyers routinely face the problem of getting conflicting instructions from board directors and owners because their client is a company, lawyers say.

The inherent difficulty of taking instructions from a company – a non-speaking, artificial legal entity – was exposed this week after The Australian Financial Review detailed the multi-million dollar fallout between top tier law firm Herbert Smith Freehills and its former client United Petroleum.

Loading...
Misa Han writes on news and business from our Sydney newsroom. Connect with Misa on Twitter. Email Misa at misa.han@afr.com.au
Katie Walsh is the editor of Legal Affairs. She is based in our Sydney newsroom. Connect with Katie on Twitter.

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

Read More

Latest In Professional services

Fetching latest articles

Most Viewed In Companies

    Original URL: https://www.afr.com/companies/professional-services/freehills-dispute-exposes-confusion-over-who-lawyers-work-for-20180404-h0yatt