August Towers apartment builder Build 29 completed $35 million tower without builder’s licence blaming administration error
A COMPANY behind a $35 million city apartment tower completed the project without having a builders’ licence but has blamed the oversight on an administrative error.
SA News
Don't miss out on the headlines from SA News. Followed categories will be added to My News.
- Bianco files $177,800 lawsuit against August Towers builder
- Interactive: map shows Adelaide’s urban infill hot spots
- Interactive: bird’s-eye view of Adelaide
A COMPANY behind a $35 million city apartment tower completed the project without having a builders’ licence but has blamed the oversight on an administrative error.
Build 29, which this week completed construction of the 14-storey August Towers apartments on the corner of Hutt St and South Tce, surrendered its licence on October 10, according to licence details held by Consumer and Business Services.
It is illegal to undertake residential or commercial construction without a building licence with owners potentially unable to make an insurance claim for any defects.
Daniel Sghirripa, of Build 29, told The Advertiser that the information had come to the company’s attention on Tuesday after notification from CBS.
“We are now rectifying the situation as a matter of urgency as the licence was surrendered by mistake as a result of an internal administration error,” he said in an email.
The Advertiser raised the matter with the CBS and Build 29 in the past week after the director of a major Adelaide building firm alerted the paper to the breach.
Build 29 is part of the Sgherza Group, whose director is Sam Sgerzha.
Mr Sgherza and Mr Sghirripa are licensed to undertake residential construction.
A spokesman for CBS said the agency had not received any complaints regarding August Towers.
“Where Consumer and Business Services receives complaints relating to a build those matters are reviewed and investigated as appropriate,” he said.
But The Advertiser has sought further clarification from CBS and Build 29 as to the potential implications to investors from the absence of the building licence, in particular on the company’s builder’s indemnity insurance.
Bianco has alleged that Build 29 ignored payment demands lodged between June and August last year.