Opponents to controversial Glenelg Seawall Apartments developers air their fears at SCAP meeting

Opponents of a controversial $165m Glenelg tower have slammed the “ridiculous” proposal after planners recommend it get a green light.

Artist's impression of Chasecrown $165m apartment development at 21-25 South Esplanade, Glenelg. Pic: Supplied

A decision on the fate of the $165m, 13-storey apartment building planned for Glenelg is expected to be handed down by midday Thursday.

Developer Chasecrown plans to transform the Seawall Apartments site into a luxury tower comprising 93 apartments.

The State Commission Assessment Panel held a public hearing on the development on Wednesday.

A report presented to SCAP recommended approval for the development.

Holdfast Bay Council has been vocal in its opposition to the project, with Mayor Amanda Wilson presenting their concerns to SCAP.

“Council does not oppose a redevelopment of the site, providing it is in accordance with the Development Act,” she said.

“We seek that proper law be applied, the plan and law that was consulted with council and the community.

“Residents are required to comply with the Act, why not developers?

Chasecrown architect Louis Kanellos said the project came about as a direct result of high demand for residential accommodation in the area.

“This site is the last site available for any meaningful development in the precinct,” he said.

Seawall Apartments at Glenelg could be demolished.

Mr Kanellos said 20 per cent of the site area would be landscaped and public artwork incorporated into the development.

A cafe has been ruled out at the site due to potentially low patronage in winter and the area being well-serviced with cafes already.

He said the development would offer “quality, state-of-the-art living options”.

SOS Save Our Seawall Apartments founding member Karen DeCean is hopeful the plan will be quashed.

Ms DeCean said opponents had a number of issues with the development, including a 13 storey development going into an area currently zoned for five storey heights.

“The main issue is the overarch of the development – it’s just unbelievable,” she said.

“It just destroys the fabric of what Glenelg South is.

The sheer bulk and size is ridiculous for the area. It would destroy residents’ quality of life. It would also destroy the amenity of Glenelg South and the lovely, relaxed ambience it has.”